analiza aiqbench
This research identifies a critical "routing failure" in vision-language models where internal representations of beliefs and intentions are not effectively utilized to generate subsequent actions. By introducing the Cross-Axis Routing Diagnostic (CARD) and a new cooperative benchmark, the study reveals that current VLMs leave valuable partner information unused during decision-making processes. This diagnostic framework offers a concrete pathway for improving multi-agent collaboration and reasoning capabilities in next-generation AI systems.
CARD: Diagnosing Belief to Action Routing Failures in Vision Language Models
arXiv:2608.20763v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Linear probes and activation steering have uncovered that vision-language models (VLMs) internally represent mental states such as agents' beliefs, knowledge, and intentions. However, it is unclear whether and how these representations are used by downstream predictions along these axes. To close this gap, we introduce Cross-Axis Routing Diagnostic (CARD), which steers activations along one axis while measuring the response of a different axis's prediction. Applied to open-weight VLMs on Relay Chain -- a new cooperative grid-world benchmark we propose -- we diagnose a critical routing failure: models fail to incorporate belief representations into their next action prediction, effectively leaving valuable information about their partners unused.
Abstract:Linear probes and activation steering have uncovered that vision-language models (VLMs) internally represent mental states such as agents' beliefs, knowledge, and intentions. However, it is unclear whether and how these representations are used by downstream predictions along these axes. To close this gap, we introduce Cross-Axis Routing Diagnostic (CARD), which steers activations along one axis while measuring the response of a different axis's prediction. Applied to open-weight VLMs on Relay Chain -- a new cooperative grid-world benchmark we propose -- we diagnose a critical routing failure: models fail to incorporate belief representations into their next action prediction, effectively leaving valuable information about their partners unused.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.20763 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2608.20763v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20763 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 205 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026
Reliability-Aware Sparse Route Memory for Round-Trip Vision-Language Navigation
arXiv · 29 sept. 2026

Frontier AI Risk Report (February–March 2026)
METR · 19 mai 2026

Informe de riesgos de la IA de frontera (febrero–marzo de 2026)
METR · 19 mai 2026