Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This research introduces David-GRPO, a reinforcement learning method that enables small language models to perform multi-hop reasoning under strict computational budgets by overcoming "retrieval collapse." By leveraging expert trajectory seeding and evidence-guided continuation, the approach matches performance from methods using twenty times more compute while requiring no annotated evidence. The work advances efficient training strategies for resource-constrained AI agents without relying on large-scale rollouts.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Can David Beat Goliath? On Multi-Hop Reasoning with Resource-Constrained Agents

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2601.21699v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) trains small language model agents to answer multi-hop questions by retrieving evidence over multiple turns, but reported gains typically rely on thousands of on-policy rollouts per update. We study RL for such agents under the budget constraint of commodity GPUs, where each update samples only a few rollouts per question. Under this constraint, most sampled trajectories retrieve none of the required evidence, so the outcome reward gives the policy little to learn from and small agents settle for answering without retrieval, a failure we call \emph{retrieval collapse}. David-GRPO addresses this with two mechanisms: (1) \emph{Expert trajectory seeding} places a handful of off-policy expert trajectories into the GRPO groups of the early updates, and (2) \emph{evidence-guided continuation} rewards evidence coverage and resumes the most promising partial trajectory. The evidence for each training question is constructed from the corpus link graph, so no annotated evidence is required. On six multi-hop QA benchmarks, David-GRPO trained on four RTX 3090 GPUs with 144 rollouts per step brings Qwen2.5-1.5B to 22.6 average EM against 11.9 for the best baseline under the same budget, matches Tree-GRPO trained with 20 times more rollouts, and, unlike the baselines that stop after at most one search, learns to retrieve across turns. The implementation is available at: https://github.com/AsadalJung/David-GRPO

Title:Can David Beat Goliath? On Multi-Hop Reasoning with Resource-Constrained Agents

Abstract:Reinforcement learning (RL) trains small language model agents to answer multi-hop questions by retrieving evidence over multiple turns, but reported gains typically rely on thousands of on-policy rollouts per update. We study RL for such agents under the budget constraint of commodity GPUs, where each update samples only a few rollouts per question. Under this constraint, most sampled trajectories retrieve none of the required evidence, so the outcome reward gives the policy little to learn from and small agents settle for answering without retrieval, a failure we call \emph{retrieval collapse}. David-GRPO addresses this with two mechanisms: (1) \emph{Expert trajectory seeding} places a handful of off-policy expert trajectories into the GRPO groups of the early updates, and (2) \emph{evidence-guided continuation} rewards evidence coverage and resumes the most promising partial trajectory. The evidence for each training question is constructed from the corpus link graph, so no annotated evidence is required. On six multi-hop QA benchmarks, David-GRPO trained on four RTX 3090 GPUs with 144 rollouts per step brings Qwen2.5-1.5B to 22.6 average EM against 11.9 for the best baseline under the same budget, matches Tree-GRPO trained with 20 times more rollouts, and, unlike the baselines that stop after at most one search, learns to retrieve across turns. The implementation is available at: this https URL

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)

arXiv:2601.21699 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2601.21699v4 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.21699 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 319 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe