analiza aiqbench
This study demonstrates that successful code execution by LLMs does not guarantee statistically valid results, highlighting the critical need for frozen metadata specifications and fully defined output contracts over reliance on execution diagnostics. The findings reveal that evaluator design and contract clarity significantly dominate measured agent error rates in high-stakes data analysis tasks. For developers building reliable AI agents, this underscores a shift from simple retry loops to semantic validation against authoritative datasets.
Can Coding Agents Reproduce Official Statistics? Metadata, Retry Budget and the Limits of Execution Feedback in a Controlled Eurostat Benchmark
arXiv:2609.22222v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models can generate executable data-analysis code, but successful execution is not equivalent to a valid official-statistics result. This study asks whether authoritative metadata and execution feedback improve the reproducibility of Eurostat answers produced by a coding agent, and isolates what execution feedback actually contributes. A benchmark of 30 natural-language tasks covering seven domains, seven Eurostat datasets and four difficulty tiers was run under four conditions: task only (A), task plus a frozen dataset metadata card (B), metadata plus a repair loop driven by sanitized execution feedback (C), and metadata plus the same attempt budget with no diagnostics of any kind (D). Claude Sonnet 5 generated Python through the Anthropic Messages API in three independent replicates, yielding 360 task-runs. Exact correctness required successful execution, the correct dataset, filters, output shape, values and unit. A companion experiment run under an under-specified output contract, in which the required ranking key and unit representation were never stated to the model, understated condition C by 23.4 points, showing that evaluator and contract design can dominate measured agent error. Reliable statistical coding agents need semantic validation against frozen specifications, a fully specified output contract, and a retry budget - not execution diagnostics.
Title:Can Coding Agents Reproduce Official Statistics? Metadata, Retry Budget and the Limits of Execution Feedback in a Controlled Eurostat Benchmark
Abstract:Large language models can generate executable data-analysis code, but successful execution is not equivalent to a valid official-statistics result. This study asks whether authoritative metadata and execution feedback improve the reproducibility of Eurostat answers produced by a coding agent, and isolates what execution feedback actually contributes. A benchmark of 30 natural-language tasks covering seven domains, seven Eurostat datasets and four difficulty tiers was run under four conditions: task only (A), task plus a frozen dataset metadata card (B), metadata plus a repair loop driven by sanitized execution feedback (C), and metadata plus the same attempt budget with no diagnostics of any kind (D). Claude Sonnet 5 generated Python through the Anthropic Messages API in three independent replicates, yielding 360 task-runs. Exact correctness required successful execution, the correct dataset, filters, output shape, values and unit. A companion experiment run under an under-specified output contract, in which the required ranking key and unit representation were never stated to the model, understated condition C by 23.4 points, showing that evaluator and contract design can dominate measured agent error. Reliable statistical coding agents need semantic validation against frozen specifications, a fully specified output contract, and a retry budget - not execution diagnostics.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
arXiv:2609.22222 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.22222v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22222 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 320 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · 21 iul. 2026

Build a Physical AI model factory with NVIDIA Cosmos 3 on SageMaker HyperPod
AWS · 4 sept. 2026

Bridging intent and execution in agentic systems
Amazon Science · 8 iun. 2026

Informe de riesgos de la IA de frontera (febrero–marzo de 2026)
METR · 19 mai 2026