analiza aiqbench
This replication study demonstrates that classical semantic-extractive summarization methods fail to outperform simple lead-sentence baselines in Hindi, revealing a systemic bias in current evaluation corpora toward non-content selection. The findings suggest that existing benchmarks like XL-Sum and FIRE ILSUM 2.0 do not adequately reward meaningful content extraction for low-resource languages, necessitating purpose-built resources.
Can Classical Semantic-Extractive Summarization Be Evaluated in Hindi? A Replication Study
arXiv:2609.29090v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We replicate the distributional-semantics extractive summarisation method of Mohd, Jan and Shah (2020) and adapt it to Hindi, substituting a Devanagari-appropriate component at every language-specific step. The system is evaluated on two independent corpora --- the Hindi portion of XL-Sum and FIRE ILSUM 2.0 Hindi --- under a Devanagari-aware ROUGE implementation validated against the XL-Sum authors' own multilingual scorer, with all comparisons drawn as 1000-resample paired bootstraps. In its published equal-weight configuration the replicated system is significantly worse than a three-sentence lead baseline on both corpora, trailing Lead-3 by 0.042 ROUGE-1 Fon XL-Sum and by 0.265 on ILSUM. A feature ablation shows that sentenceposition is the only feature that contributes: position alone reproduces the lead baseline exactly, removing position gives the weakest configuration,and a validation-tuned weighting can at best equal Lead-3 and never exceed it. TextRank fails identically, making this a class-level rather than an implementation-level result. A selection analysis shows the remaining features steer extraction towards long, entity-dense body sentences while the references reuse the article lead.Current Hindi benchmarks therefore cannot reward non-lead content selection, motivating purpose-built evaluation resources.
Title:Can Classical Semantic-Extractive Summarization Be Evaluated in Hindi? A Replication Study
Abstract:We replicate the distributional-semantics extractive summarisation method of Mohd, Jan and Shah (2020) and adapt it to Hindi, substituting a Devanagari-appropriate component at every language-specific step. The system is evaluated on two independent corpora --- the Hindi portion of XL-Sum and FIRE ILSUM 2.0 Hindi --- under a Devanagari-aware ROUGE implementation validated against the XL-Sum authors' own multilingual scorer, with all comparisons drawn as 1000-resample paired bootstraps. In its published equal-weight configuration the replicated system is significantly worse than a three-sentence lead baseline on both corpora, trailing Lead-3 by 0.042 ROUGE-1 Fon XL-Sum and by 0.265 on ILSUM. A feature ablation shows that sentenceposition is the only feature that contributes: position alone reproduces the lead baseline exactly, removing position gives the weakest configuration,and a validation-tuned weighting can at best equal Lead-3 and never exceed it. TextRank fails identically, making this a class-level rather than an implementation-level result. A selection analysis shows the remaining features steer extraction towards long, entity-dense body sentences while the references reuse the article this http URL Hindi benchmarks therefore cannot reward non-lead content selection, motivating purpose-built evaluation resources.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.29090 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.29090v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.29090 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 291 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
A Systematic Evaluation of Traditional Privacy Policy Analysis Tools Against LLMs
arXiv · 21 iul. 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · 8 oct. 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · 5 oct. 2026

Biomedical Imaging's Real Bottleneck Is the Data, Not the Model
Databricks · 8 oct. 2026