analiza aiqbench
This paper proposes a pragmatic framework for assessing AI free will, shifting the focus from algorithmic indeterminism to whether systems function as intentional agents with genuine choice and control. By drawing on Daniel Dennett's philosophy, it argues that if we have explanatory reasons to view an AI as capable of navigating alternative possibilities, it possesses free will in a diagnostically useful sense. This theoretical approach advances the critical discourse on AI agency without relying on mystical properties or unpredictability.
Can AI systems have free will?
arXiv:2609.15407v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While there has been much discussion of whether AI systems could function as moral agents or acquire sentience, there has been very little discussion of whether AI systems could have free will. I sketch a framework for thinking about this question, inspired by Daniel Dennett's work. I argue that, to determine whether an AI system has free will, we should not look for some mysterious property, expect its underlying algorithms to be indeterministic, or ask whether the system is unpredictable. Rather, we should simply ask whether we have good explanatory reasons to view the system as an intentional agent, with the capacity for choice between alternative possibilities and control over the resulting actions. If the answer is "yes", then the system counts as having free will in a pragmatic and diagnostically useful sense.
Title:Can AI systems have free will?
Abstract:While there has been much discussion of whether AI systems could function as moral agents or acquire sentience, there has been very little discussion of whether AI systems could have free will. I sketch a framework for thinking about this question, inspired by Daniel Dennett's work. I argue that, to determine whether an AI system has free will, we should not look for some mysterious property, expect its underlying algorithms to be indeterministic, or ask whether the system is unpredictable. Rather, we should simply ask whether we have good explanatory reasons to view the system as an intentional agent, with the capacity for choice between alternative possibilities and control over the resulting actions. If the answer is "yes", then the system counts as having free will in a pragmatic and diagnostically useful sense.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph)
arXiv:2609.15407 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.15407v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.15407 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-05209-x Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 251 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Thermodynamics and Objects
LessWrong · 23 sept. 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026

Quantum Keys Travel 18 Kilometers Across Hybrid Air-and-Fiber Network
The Quantum Insider · 26 aug. 2026