analiza aiqbench
This research introduces NetArtifactBench, a benchmark evaluating AI agents' ability to maintain "artifact integrity" by detecting and repairing inconsistencies in network experiment records. The study reveals a significant performance gap between simple local corrections and complex record-level repairs involving implicit relations, suggesting that trustworthiness must be a core design requirement for autonomous agents in networking environments.
Can AI Agents Detect and Repair Artifact Drift in Network Experiments?
arXiv:2609.09849v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In recent years, AI agents have evolved into capable assistants that carry out multi-step tasks in digital environments. The network systems community is beginning to explore these capabilities in operational and experimental settings. However, an agent operating in network systems should not be judged solely by whether it completes the immediate task. The experiment record it modifies must also remain trustworthy. We call this property artifact integrity: the record's claims must remain supported by the available evidence, confined to the scope established by that evidence, and traceable through the artifacts that encode their support. To make this property measurable, we introduce NetArtifactBench, which tests whether AI agents can repair inconsistent records derived from public network-system artifacts while preserving claims that remain supported. The benchmark contains 52 instances with injected inconsistencies ranging from direct contradictions to unstated relations spread across several artifacts. We evaluate 23 agent configurations across three general-purpose AI agent runtimes using deterministic scoring. The average contract pass rate is 65.3 % across 5,980 outputs, but no agent runtime exceeds 30 % when repair requires recovering implicit relations and propagating changes across artifacts. These results reveal a sharp boundary between local correction and complete record-level repair. Therefore, we argue that artifact integrity should become a first-class design and evaluation requirement for AI agents operating on network systems.
Title:Can AI Agents Detect and Repair Artifact Drift in Network Experiments?
Abstract:In recent years, AI agents have evolved into capable assistants that carry out multi-step tasks in digital environments. The network systems community is beginning to explore these capabilities in operational and experimental settings. However, an agent operating in network systems should not be judged solely by whether it completes the immediate task. The experiment record it modifies must also remain trustworthy. We call this property artifact integrity: the record's claims must remain supported by the available evidence, confined to the scope established by that evidence, and traceable through the artifacts that encode their support. To make this property measurable, we introduce NetArtifactBench, which tests whether AI agents can repair inconsistent records derived from public network-system artifacts while preserving claims that remain supported. The benchmark contains 52 instances with injected inconsistencies ranging from direct contradictions to unstated relations spread across several artifacts. We evaluate 23 agent configurations across three general-purpose AI agent runtimes using deterministic scoring. The average contract pass rate is 65.3 % across 5,980 outputs, but no agent runtime exceeds 30 % when repair requires recovering implicit relations and propagating changes across artifacts. These results reveal a sharp boundary between local correction and complete record-level repair. Therefore, we argue that artifact integrity should become a first-class design and evaluation requirement for AI agents operating on network systems.
Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
arXiv:2609.09849 [cs.NI]
(or arXiv:2609.09849v1 [cs.NI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.09849 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 332 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · 17 oct. 2026

Run agent-driven Amazon SageMaker HyperPod operations with InstantStart
AWS · 4 sept. 2026

AgentOps: Operationalize agentic AI at scale with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · 1 iun. 2026
Modern BSA/AML compliance on Databricks
Databricks · 10 iun. 2026