analiza aiqbench
This research establishes a validity criterion for count-dependent nonconformity scores in conformal prediction, proving that transferring counts between classes must not improve conformity to maintain exchangeable validity. The study further demonstrates that efficiency gains from specific live-count rules are negligible compared to uniform weights, while also highlighting potential undercoverage issues in iid resampling scenarios. These findings clarify the distinct roles of validity and efficiency in calibration count reuse without relying on benchmark observations as universal guarantees.
Calibration Count Reuse: Validity Does Not Determine Efficiency
arXiv:2609.25138v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Calibration count reuse raises separate validity and efficiency questions. We give a validity criterion for general count-dependent nonconformity scores: transferring one count from another class to the scored class must not improve its conformity. A leave-self-out full conformal reference proves the criterion without requiring normalization or preservation of same-class score order. For a common separable transformation, universal exchangeable validity is equivalent to being nondecreasing in the count, provided $K\alpha \geq 1$; normalized multiplicative weights obey the complementary nonincreasing condition. Additive penalties are covered under the stated information restrictions. Efficiency has no parallel ordering: two iid constructions make the same valid rule improve or worsen expected size at unchanged coverage. An expanded 55-rule study finds no resolved advantage from selected live-count rules over uniform weights. Image studies identify undercoverage under iid resampling, including at numerical convergence. Separately, execution of the released Conf-OT pipeline on its DTD and Aircraft benchmark subsets produces near-nominal median coverage under fixed stratified counts. The native results are reported separately from the iid analyses, without treating a benchmark observation as a universal guarantee. The findings separate validity, classifier confidence, numerical convergence, and population-specific efficiency.
Abstract:Calibration count reuse raises separate validity and efficiency questions. We give a validity criterion for general count-dependent nonconformity scores: transferring one count from another class to the scored class must not improve its conformity. A leave-self-out full conformal reference proves the criterion without requiring normalization or preservation of same-class score order. For a common separable transformation, universal exchangeable validity is equivalent to being nondecreasing in the count, provided $K\alpha \geq 1$; normalized multiplicative weights obey the complementary nonincreasing condition. Additive penalties are covered under the stated information restrictions. Efficiency has no parallel ordering: two iid constructions make the same valid rule improve or worsen expected size at unchanged coverage. An expanded 55-rule study finds no resolved advantage from selected live-count rules over uniform weights. Image studies identify undercoverage under iid resampling, including at numerical convergence. Separately, execution of the released Conf-OT pipeline on its DTD and Aircraft benchmark subsets produces near-nominal median coverage under fixed stratified counts. The native results are reported separately from the iid analyses, without treating a benchmark observation as a universal guarantee. The findings separate validity, classifier confidence, numerical convergence, and population-specific efficiency.
Methodology (stat.ME); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.25138 [stat.ME]
(or arXiv:2609.25138v1 [stat.ME] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.25138 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 289 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

NVIDIA Vera Storage Benchmarks: Faster Encryption, Compression, Integrity Checking, and Recovery for AI-Native Storage
NVIDIA · 3 aug. 2026
DI Series: Serving Kimi-K3 MXFP4 Wide-EP Disaggregated on AMD Instinct MI300X and MI325X
AMD · 8 oct. 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · 15 aug. 2026

Build a Physical AI model factory with NVIDIA Cosmos 3 on SageMaker HyperPod
AWS · 4 sept. 2026