Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This study uses GPT-2 models trained on synthetic bilingual datasets to simulate human language acquisition, demonstrating that statistical learners face no inherent challenges in acquiring multiple languages simultaneously. The research provides definitive evidence against the hypothesis that multilingual input causes delays or performance degradation compared to monolingual training regimes.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv

Bringing Up a Bilingual BabyLM: Investigating Multilingual Language Acquisition Using Small-Scale Models

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2603.29552v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multilingualism is incredibly common around the world, leading to many important theoretical and practical questions, including whether multilingual acquisition leads to delays in learning and whether there are better and worse ways to structure multilingual input. Many correlational studies address these questions, but it is surprisingly difficult to get definitive answers because children cannot be randomly assigned to be multilingual and data are typically not matched between languages. We create matched mono- and bilingual datasets using synthetic data and machine translation to simulate a variety of controlled exposure conditions, pairing English with Spanish, Chinese, and Dutch input. We train GPT-2 models on these datasets and evaluate their performance on perplexity, grammaticality, and semantic knowledge. Across model scales, measures, and languages, bilingual models perform similarly to monolingual models in the first language, but show strong performance in the second as well. Control experiments show that our findings hold on real-world language data and even on shuffled second-language input. These results suggest that there are no strong differences between different bilingual exposure regimes, and bilingual input poses no in-principle challenges for agnostic statistical learners.

Abstract:Multilingualism is incredibly common around the world, leading to many important theoretical and practical questions, including whether multilingual acquisition leads to delays in learning and whether there are better and worse ways to structure multilingual input. Many correlational studies address these questions, but it is surprisingly difficult to get definitive answers because children cannot be randomly assigned to be multilingual and data are typically not matched between languages. We create matched mono- and bilingual datasets using synthetic data and machine translation to simulate a variety of controlled exposure conditions, pairing English with Spanish, Chinese, and Dutch input. We train GPT-2 models on these datasets and evaluate their performance on perplexity, grammaticality, and semantic knowledge. Across model scales, measures, and languages, bilingual models perform similarly to monolingual models in the first language, but show strong performance in the second as well. Control experiments show that our findings hold on real-world language data and even on shuffled second-language input. These results suggest that there are no strong differences between different bilingual exposure regimes, and bilingual input poses no in-principle challenges for agnostic statistical learners.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2603.29552 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2603.29552v3 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.29552 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 281 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe