analiza aiqbench
BraveGuard addresses the critical safety gap in computer-use agents by shifting from static, prompt-level filtering to adaptive, trajectory-level supervision derived from real-world threat signals. This framework significantly boosts detection accuracy on the AgentHazard benchmark, demonstrating that grounding guard models in executable task rollouts is essential for mitigating multi-step harm where individual actions appear benign. The approach offers a scalable, self-evolving defense loop that moves beyond fixed taxonomies to handle emerging risks in autonomous agent environments.
BraveGuard: From Open-World Threats to Safer Computer-Use Agents
arXiv:2606.01166v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Computer-use agents extend language models from text generation to sustained interaction with files, terminals, browsers, and external tools. This shift creates safety risks that are difficult to detect from isolated prompts or final responses, because harm often emerges only through multi-step execution traces whose individual actions appear locally benign. We introduce BraveGuard, a self-evolving defense framework for training guard models from open-world threat signals and realistic agent trajectories. BraveGuard mines recent research sources to identify emerging risks and attack patterns, instantiates them as executable computer-use tasks, collects agent rollouts, and derives trajectory-level supervision for guard model training. As new threats and validation failures appear, the pipeline can be repeated, yielding an adaptive defense loop rather than a static, benchmark-driven training process. We instantiate BraveGuard by training multiple guard backbones, including Qwen3-Guard and Llama-Guard variants, and evaluate the resulting guards on trajectory-level agent-safety benchmarks. BraveGuard consistently improves safety detection across computer-use trajectories. On AgentHazard, it substantially improves detection accuracy over off-the-shelf guard models, with accuracy increasing from 38.79% to 82.38% under the averaged guard-model setting. These results show that guard supervision grounded in open-world threat discovery and realistic agent execution can improve safety monitoring beyond fixed taxonomies and synthetic prompt-level data. BraveGuard offers a scalable path toward adaptive defenses for computer-use agents facing evolving real-world risks.
Abstract:Computer-use agents extend language models from text generation to sustained interaction with files, terminals, browsers, and external tools. This shift creates safety risks that are difficult to detect from isolated prompts or final responses, because harm often emerges only through multi-step execution traces whose individual actions appear locally benign. We introduce BraveGuard, a self-evolving defense framework for training guard models from open-world threat signals and realistic agent trajectories. BraveGuard mines recent research sources to identify emerging risks and attack patterns, instantiates them as executable computer-use tasks, collects agent rollouts, and derives trajectory-level supervision for guard model training. As new threats and validation failures appear, the pipeline can be repeated, yielding an adaptive defense loop rather than a static, benchmark-driven training process. We instantiate BraveGuard by training multiple guard backbones, including Qwen3-Guard and Llama-Guard variants, and evaluate the resulting guards on trajectory-level agent-safety benchmarks. BraveGuard consistently improves safety detection across computer-use trajectories. On AgentHazard, it substantially improves detection accuracy over off-the-shelf guard models, with accuracy increasing from 38.79% to 82.38% under the averaged guard-model setting. These results show that guard supervision grounded in open-world threat discovery and realistic agent execution can improve safety monitoring beyond fixed taxonomies and synthetic prompt-level data. BraveGuard offers a scalable path toward adaptive defenses for computer-use agents facing evolving real-world risks.
Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2606.01166 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2606.01166v2 [cs.CR] for this version)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 231 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Secure Acceleration (linkpost)
LessWrong · 25 sept. 2026
Debating RSI, the US-China Gap, and Jaggedness with JS Denain of Epoch AI
Interconnects · 22 sept. 2026

Kimi K3: The open-weights escalation
Interconnects · 20 iul. 2026

Microsoft AI CEO says AI threats are real, and Anthropic is making it worse
The Verge · 17 sept. 2026