analiza aiqbench
BrainTRACE introduces a rigorous benchmark for evaluating vision-language models on the complex task of longitudinal brain MRI interpretation, addressing critical gaps in current evaluations that rely on isolated images or static volumes. By requiring models to trace evidence chains across multiple sequences and time points, this work directly advances machine learning capabilities in specialized medical imaging domains where clinical validity depends on synthesizing volumetric data.
BrainTRACE: Tracing Longitudinal, Multimodal, and Volumetric Evidence in Brain MRI Clinical Reasoning
arXiv:2610.06571v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Brain MRI interpretation is a longitudinal clinical reasoning problem: radiologists compare serial studies, integrate information across MRI sequences, localize findings within volumetric anatomy, and translate this evidence into report-grounded assessments. Existing medical VQA and 3D imaging benchmarks capture important parts of this workflow, but often evaluate brain MRI through isolated images, static volumes, or ungrounded report-style answers, thereby obscuring failures in the evidence chain that support clinical validity. We introduce BrainTRACE, a report-grounded benchmark for evaluating whether vision-language models can trace the evidence structure required for longitudinal brain MRI interpretation. BrainTRACE contains 7,273 scored VQA instances derived from 1,778 longitudinal patients, 7,299 MRI studies, and approximately 29k co-registered 3D MRI sequence volumes. The benchmark is organized by five levels of clinical reasoning, from acquisition recognition to case-level synthesis, and by evidence demands covering longitudinal comparison, report-grounded references, multi-sequence integration, and volumetric spatial evidence. BrainTRACE supports rendered inputs compatible with standard VLM interfaces, a 3D-evidence condition, and a decomposed case-reasoning track that audits six steps in a longitudinal evidence chain. Evaluation of 20 VLM configurations shows that current systems can identify isolated visual cues but rarely compose them into grounded longitudinal interpretations. We release the benchmark specification, evaluation lists, scoring implementation, scoring rubrics, and audit-record format to support reproducible progress in brain MRI VLM evaluation.
Abstract:Brain MRI interpretation is a longitudinal clinical reasoning problem: radiologists compare serial studies, integrate information across MRI sequences, localize findings within volumetric anatomy, and translate this evidence into report-grounded assessments. Existing medical VQA and 3D imaging benchmarks capture important parts of this workflow, but often evaluate brain MRI through isolated images, static volumes, or ungrounded report-style answers, thereby obscuring failures in the evidence chain that support clinical validity. We introduce BrainTRACE, a report-grounded benchmark for evaluating whether vision-language models can trace the evidence structure required for longitudinal brain MRI interpretation. BrainTRACE contains 7,273 scored VQA instances derived from 1,778 longitudinal patients, 7,299 MRI studies, and approximately 29k co-registered 3D MRI sequence volumes. The benchmark is organized by five levels of clinical reasoning, from acquisition recognition to case-level synthesis, and by evidence demands covering longitudinal comparison, report-grounded references, multi-sequence integration, and volumetric spatial evidence. BrainTRACE supports rendered inputs compatible with standard VLM interfaces, a 3D-evidence condition, and a decomposed case-reasoning track that audits six steps in a longitudinal evidence chain. Evaluation of 20 VLM configurations shows that current systems can identify isolated visual cues but rarely compose them into grounded longitudinal interpretations. We release the benchmark specification, evaluation lists, scoring implementation, scoring rubrics, and audit-record format to support reproducible progress in brain MRI VLM evaluation.
35 pages. Accepted to NeurIPS 2026
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.06571 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2610.06571v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.06571 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 320 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
MedHarnessBench: A Unified Benchmark for Healthcare Agent Evaluation
arXiv · 15 oct. 2026

Introducing NV-Reason-CT Open 3D CT VLM for Radiologist Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
NVIDIA · 23 sept. 2026
MedTRACE: Tool-Augmented Multimodal Clinical Reasoning Agents for Evidence-Grounded Decision-Making
arXiv · 15 sept. 2026

NVIDIA’s NV-Reason-CT brings AI reasoning to 3D CT scans
Quantum Zeitgeist · 24 sept. 2026