analiza aiqbench
This research introduces BOOKMARKS, a search-based memory framework designed to enhance long-horizon consistency in role-playing agents by retaining full storyline access rather than relying on lossy incremental summarization. By implementing passive updating to reuse semantically equivalent checkpoints, the method significantly reduces redundant computation while improving next-action prediction and reasoning accuracy in complex narrative tasks.
BOOKMARKS: Efficient Active Storyline Memory for Role-playing
arXiv:2605.14169v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Memory systems are critical for role-playing agents (RPAs) to maintain long-horizon consistency. However, existing RPA memory methods (e.g., profiling) mainly rely on incremental summarization, whose compression discards details which become inaccessible to subsequent grounding. To address this issue, we propose a search-based memory framework called \textbf{\underline{BOOKMARKS}} for \textbf{active grounding}, which retains access to the full preceding storyline and collects task-relevant information on demand. Since summarizing the preceding storyline anew for each grounding request incurs substantial redundant computation, BOOKMARKS introduces \textbf{passive updating} to reuse earlier search results as checkpoints. Each \textbf{bookmark} represents the \textbf{content} about a particular aspect (\textbf{section}) of story information at a specific synchronization \textbf{point}. For current task, BOOKMARKS searches for only useful contents, reuses existing semantically equivalent bookmarks or initializes new ones, and synchronizes the selected ones from their stored checkpoints to the current scene. A reused bookmark thus only needs to process the newly observed storyline suffix, avoiding repeated synchronization. We evaluate BOOKMARKS across six narrative artifacts involving 47 characters and 9,537 test cases against non-active grounding baselines, covering next-action prediction and challenging, human-authored reasoning questions from a mystery game. BOOKMARKS improves next-action fidelity in a five-dimensional evaluation (emotion, intent, causality, position, and content) and raises mystery-game reasoning accuracy from 39.44\% to 45.42\% over the strongest baseline.
Abstract:Memory systems are critical for role-playing agents (RPAs) to maintain long-horizon consistency. However, existing RPA memory methods (e.g., profiling) mainly rely on incremental summarization, whose compression discards details which become inaccessible to subsequent grounding. To address this issue, we propose a search-based memory framework called \textbf{\underline{BOOKMARKS}} for \textbf{active grounding}, which retains access to the full preceding storyline and collects task-relevant information on demand. Since summarizing the preceding storyline anew for each grounding request incurs substantial redundant computation, BOOKMARKS introduces \textbf{passive updating} to reuse earlier search results as checkpoints. Each \textbf{bookmark} represents the \textbf{content} about a particular aspect (\textbf{section}) of story information at a specific synchronization \textbf{point}. For current task, BOOKMARKS searches for only useful contents, reuses existing semantically equivalent bookmarks or initializes new ones, and synchronizes the selected ones from their stored checkpoints to the current scene. A reused bookmark thus only needs to process the newly observed storyline suffix, avoiding repeated synchronization. We evaluate BOOKMARKS across six narrative artifacts involving 47 characters and 9,537 test cases against non-active grounding baselines, covering next-action prediction and challenging, human-authored reasoning questions from a mystery game. BOOKMARKS improves next-action fidelity in a five-dimensional evaluation (emotion, intent, causality, position, and content) and raises mystery-game reasoning accuracy from 39.44\% to 45.42\% over the strongest baseline.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2605.14169 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2605.14169v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.14169 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 303 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · 12 iun. 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · 23 sept. 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · 8 oct. 2026