Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

BOLT introduces a novel reinforcement learning approach that tightly couples scheduling decisions with vehicle transport constraints, achieving significant makespan reductions without relying on external solvers. By deriving a provable lower bound from system relaxations, the method provides inherent optimality guarantees and operates at millisecond speeds per event, making it viable for real-time industrial disruption handling. This work advances the frontier of applying machine learning to complex combinatorial optimization problems in manufacturing logistics.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

BOLT: Multi-Bottleneck Bound-Guided Learning for Flexible Job-Shop Scheduling with Time Lags and Resource-Coupled Transport

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2610.22433v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Flexible job-shop scheduling becomes resource-coupled when a scarce vehicle fleet moves jobs between stations, because the schedule sets the transport waits. BOLT (bound-oriented learning for transport-coupled scheduling) builds a lower bound from chain, machine-capacity, and fleet-capacity relaxations. The bound equals the makespan at termination, so its per-step changes form a reward that sums to a constant minus the makespan. Because it never exceeds the attainable makespan, each candidate's bound increase is a proven rise of the makespan floor, which the policy reads as a price. The root bound certifies a completed schedule's suboptimality gap without a solver. On industry-motivated 10-module prefabricated-construction instances, explicit transport coupling outperforms a transport-penalty policy in every tested cell where loaded moves occupy at least 66% of fleet time and in none at or below 56%. Across five zero-shot 50- and 80-module production batches, BOLT outperforms the best dispatching-rule pair on four and the penalty policy on the three with long moves. In the three-vehicle 80-module batch, its mean makespan is 13.0% below the best pair and 4.2% below an hour-budget constraint-programming solver whose proven gap averages 34%. BOLT decides in 2.3-5.9 ms per event on one processor core and re-plans a disruption in seconds.

Abstract:Flexible job-shop scheduling becomes resource-coupled when a scarce vehicle fleet moves jobs between stations, because the schedule sets the transport waits. BOLT (bound-oriented learning for transport-coupled scheduling) builds a lower bound from chain, machine-capacity, and fleet-capacity relaxations. The bound equals the makespan at termination, so its per-step changes form a reward that sums to a constant minus the makespan. Because it never exceeds the attainable makespan, each candidate's bound increase is a proven rise of the makespan floor, which the policy reads as a price. The root bound certifies a completed schedule's suboptimality gap without a solver. On industry-motivated 10-module prefabricated-construction instances, explicit transport coupling outperforms a transport-penalty policy in every tested cell where loaded moves occupy at least 66% of fleet time and in none at or below 56%. Across five zero-shot 50- and 80-module production batches, BOLT outperforms the best dispatching-rule pair on four and the penalty policy on the three with long moves. In the three-vehicle 80-module batch, its mean makespan is 13.0% below the best pair and 4.2% below an hour-budget constraint-programming solver whose proven gap averages 34%. BOLT decides in 2.3-5.9 ms per event on one processor core and re-plans a disruption in seconds.

12 pages main text plus 18 pages of supplementary material appended after the references (30 pages total). Code, data, and trained models: this https URL. Submitted to IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)

arXiv:2610.22433 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.22433v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.22433 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 255 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe