Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This study provides a rigorous hardware evaluation of learned feature gating in fixed-point automatic modulation classifiers, revealing that the added FPGA resource cost does not yield accuracy gains over simpler ungated architectures. The findings offer critical insights for engineers deploying edge AI on FPGAs, emphasizing that complex reweighting mechanisms may be unnecessary overhead when quantization-aware training is applied effectively.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Bit-Accurate FPGA Evaluation of Learned Feature Gating in a Fixed-Point Fourier-Feature Automatic Modulation Classifier

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2607.24568v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learned feature reweighting can improve automatic modulation classification (AMC) in software, but the same operation introduces additional arithmetic and latency when implemented on an FPGA. This work measures that trade-off in a compact fixed-point classifier using 24 sparse DFT-energy features, 8 phase/statistical features, and a 32-to-128-to-11 multilayer perceptron. A second architecture inserts a learned 32-element, 8-bit, input-dependent gate before the classifier. Gated and ungated models are trained using post-training quantization (PTQ) and quantization-aware training (QAT) with two matched training seeds. The resulting eight checkpoints are compiled independently for an Intel Cyclone V FPGA and evaluated over 352,000 physical-board classifications. Ungated models achieve higher test accuracy in all four matched gate comparisons, with mean gated-minus-ungated differences of -0.784 percentage points under PTQ and -0.616 percentage points under QAT. The effect of QAT changes direction between the two training seeds. In hardware, the gate adds an average of 1,318 adaptive logic modules (ALMs), 1,557 registers, 4 DSP blocks, and 3,140 processing cycles. All 352,000 board predictions agree exactly with an independent integer reference, and 3,760 captured intermediate values from one training seed also match. For this feature representation and implementation, learned gating increases FPGA cost without improving classification accuracy.

Abstract:Learned feature reweighting can improve automatic modulation classification (AMC) in software, but the same operation introduces additional arithmetic and latency when implemented on an FPGA. This work measures that trade-off in a compact fixed-point classifier using 24 sparse DFT-energy features, 8 phase/statistical features, and a 32-to-128-to-11 multilayer perceptron. A second architecture inserts a learned 32-element, 8-bit, input-dependent gate before the classifier. Gated and ungated models are trained using post-training quantization (PTQ) and quantization-aware training (QAT) with two matched training seeds. The resulting eight checkpoints are compiled independently for an Intel Cyclone V FPGA and evaluated over 352,000 physical-board classifications. Ungated models achieve higher test accuracy in all four matched gate comparisons, with mean gated-minus-ungated differences of -0.784 percentage points under PTQ and -0.616 percentage points under QAT. The effect of QAT changes direction between the two training seeds. In hardware, the gate adds an average of 1,318 adaptive logic modules (ALMs), 1,557 registers, 4 DSP blocks, and 3,140 processing cycles. All 352,000 board predictions agree exactly with an independent integer reference, and 3,760 captured intermediate values from one training seed also match. For this feature representation and implementation, learned gating increases FPGA cost without improving classification accuracy.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2607.24568 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.24568v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.24568 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 291 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe