analiza aiqbench
This research investigates safety alignment in diffusion large language models (dLLMs), revealing that refusal signals concentrate in early denoising steps and significantly influence final outcomes. The authors propose a training-free decoding method, Refusal-Aware Early Commitment (RAEC), which effectively reduces attack success rates while maintaining model utility. These findings offer critical insights for securing next-generation generative models against adversarial prompts without requiring additional training.
Beyond Token Positions: Safety Alignment Across Denoising Steps in Diffusion Language Models
arXiv:2609.00495v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) generate text through iterative denoising rather than left-to-right decoding. This generation paradigm introduces two axes that can influence safety alignment: when tokens are generated during denoising and where they appear in the response. In this paper, we measure dLLM safety behavior under harmful prompts by tracing intermediate token distributions and commitment decisions throughout denoising. Our analysis shows that refusal signals are concentrated in early denoising steps and leading response positions, and the tokens committed early can strongly shape the final safety outcome. Our measurements further show that the denoising step and persistence of refusal-token commitment are important for understanding dLLM safety. Based on these findings, we propose Refusal-Aware Early Commitment (RAEC), a simple training-free decoding method that commits persistent refusal signals from early steps. Experiments on LLaDA and Dream show that RAEC reduces attack success rates while largely preserving utility. The code is available at https://github.com/Glresearch1/RAEC.
Abstract:Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) generate text through iterative denoising rather than left-to-right decoding. This generation paradigm introduces two axes that can influence safety alignment: when tokens are generated during denoising and where they appear in the response. In this paper, we measure dLLM safety behavior under harmful prompts by tracing intermediate token distributions and commitment decisions throughout denoising. Our analysis shows that refusal signals are concentrated in early denoising steps and leading response positions, and the tokens committed early can strongly shape the final safety outcome. Our measurements further show that the denoising step and persistence of refusal-token commitment are important for understanding dLLM safety. Based on these findings, we propose Refusal-Aware Early Commitment (RAEC), a simple training-free decoding method that commits persistent refusal signals from early steps. Experiments on LLaDA and Dream show that RAEC reduces attack success rates while largely preserving utility. The code is available at this https URL.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.00495 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.00495v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.00495 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 251 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · 8 oct. 2026
Inception in DiffusionGemma - Jailbreaking a Diffusion Language Model by Pinning Tokens Anywhere on the Canvas
LessWrong · 23 iul. 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026

Projection sampling preserves capabilities but diminishes gains from alignment fine-tuning
LessWrong · 16 oct. 2026