analiza aiqbench
This study investigates the prevalence of unfiltered extremist speech within Dolma, the open-source training corpus used to develop OLMo models, revealing hundreds of thousands of documents containing hate speech and calls for violence. The findings underscore critical risks associated with data curation strategies in large language model pre-training and highlight the necessity of rigorous filtering mechanisms before these artifacts can influence model behavior.
Beyond the pale: Assessing prevalence and contents of extremist speech in LLM training data
arXiv:2608.14813v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Despite a strong interest on the part of the research community in the topic of trustworthy and safe AI, the composition of the text corpora that large language models (LLMs) encounter in pre- and post-training has not yet drawn much attention. In this work, we address the question of whether LLMs are exposed to unfiltered, uncontextualised extremist speech. Using several definitions of extremist speech, stemming from official documents and research literature, and an extraction pipeline combining automated text processing with expert verification, we provide a lower bound on the prevalence of extremist documents in Dolma, an open training corpus underpinning the OLMo series of models. We show that Dolma is likely to include hundreds of thousands of documents containing extremist content and hate speech of several types, including direct calls for violence, and discuss the implications of this for data curation and model pre-training.
Abstract:Despite a strong interest on the part of the research community in the topic of trustworthy and safe AI, the composition of the text corpora that large language models (LLMs) encounter in pre- and post-training has not yet drawn much attention. In this work, we address the question of whether LLMs are exposed to unfiltered, uncontextualised extremist speech. Using several definitions of extremist speech, stemming from official documents and research literature, and an extraction pipeline combining automated text processing with expert verification, we provide a lower bound on the prevalence of extremist documents in Dolma, an open training corpus underpinning the OLMo series of models. We show that Dolma is likely to include hundreds of thousands of documents containing extremist content and hate speech of several types, including direct calls for violence, and discuss the implications of this for data curation and model pre-training.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2608.14813 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.14813v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14813 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 239 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 10 sept. 2026

Sen. Adam Schiff on AI regulation, free speech, and impeaching Trump one more time
The Verge · 5 oct. 2026

Introducing the Third Generation of Apple’s Foundation Models
Apple · 8 iun. 2026

Deconfusing Corrigibility
AI Alignment Forum · 17 oct. 2026