analiza aiqbench
Theo introduces an agentic framework using general-purpose coding LLMs to automatically translate natural language mathematics into verified Lean 4 proofs, addressing the critical need for mechanical validation in research. The system dynamically extends type definitions and validates auxiliary lemmas before formalizing complex theorems from top-tier papers like those at STOC. This approach demonstrates that broad-model agents can effectively handle advanced mathematical reasoning beyond standard programming tasks.
Beyond the Library: An Agentic Framework for Autoformalizing Research Mathematics
arXiv:2606.31134v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in mathematical reasoning, they frequently produce subtle errors that evade human detection. Formal mathematical languages like Lean 4 offer mechanical proof checking, strongly motivating the need for autoformalization: the automatic translation of natural language mathematics into verifiable code. Recent trends indicate that general-purpose LLMs, heavily optimized for standard programming, now outperform smaller models explicitly fine-tuned for Lean. Leveraging this shift, we introduce *Theo*, an agentic autoformalization framework powered by general coding LLMs. At the core of our system is an orchestrator that manages a multi-agent pipeline tailored for research-level mathematics. Because cutting-edge research frequently relies on concepts outside the scope of existing libraries like Mathlib, our system dynamically extends necessary type definitions and validates them via a novel Auxiliary Lemma technique before formalizing the primary theorems. We applied our approach to PutnamBench, producing machine-checked Lean proofs for a random sample of 32 problems. Furthermore, we evaluate our system on seven research papers---five from the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) and two recent OpenAI manuscripts---spanning combinatorics, communication complexity, mechanism design, learning theory, number theory, discrete geometry, and graph theory. We successfully formalize their main theorems and proofs and validate the generated formalizations with human experts; notably, two developments require no axioms beyond Lean's kernel. All of our formalizations are available at https://beyondthelibrary.github.io/formal_arxiv/.
Abstract:While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in mathematical reasoning, they frequently produce subtle errors that evade human detection. Formal mathematical languages like Lean 4 offer mechanical proof checking, strongly motivating the need for autoformalization: the automatic translation of natural language mathematics into verifiable code. Recent trends indicate that general-purpose LLMs, heavily optimized for standard programming, now outperform smaller models explicitly fine-tuned for Lean. Leveraging this shift, we introduce *Theo*, an agentic autoformalization framework powered by general coding LLMs. At the core of our system is an orchestrator that manages a multi-agent pipeline tailored for research-level mathematics. Because cutting-edge research frequently relies on concepts outside the scope of existing libraries like Mathlib, our system dynamically extends necessary type definitions and validates them via a novel Auxiliary Lemma technique before formalizing the primary theorems. We applied our approach to PutnamBench, producing machine-checked Lean proofs for a random sample of 32 problems. Furthermore, we evaluate our system on seven research papers---five from the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) and two recent OpenAI manuscripts---spanning combinatorics, communication complexity, mechanism design, learning theory, number theory, discrete geometry, and graph theory. We successfully formalize their main theorems and proofs and validate the generated formalizations with human experts; notably, two developments require no axioms beyond Lean's kernel. All of our formalizations are available at this https URL.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2606.31134 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2606.31134v3 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.31134 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 316 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Import AI 470: No rights for machines; automating environment generation with SPADE; and building better GPU kernels with Hawkeye
Import AI · 24 aug. 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026

Import AI 472: DeepMind’s cheating math agents; populist AI policies; and Forethought theorizes a nightwatchman
Import AI · 7 sept. 2026