analiza aiqbench
This research addresses the critical safety gap in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) where harmful content can hide within intermediate reasoning traces despite safe final answers. The proposed SaLT-DPO method decouples alignment for reasoning and answer segments while enforcing coherence to prevent over-refusal, offering a robust solution for deploying trustworthy AI agents.
Beyond Safe Answers: Segment-Aware Listwise Alignment for Reasoning Safety in Large Reasoning Models
arXiv:2609.15517v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) pose a dual-surface safety challenge: both intermediate reasoning traces and final answers can contain harmful content. Existing alignment methods often operate at the whole-response level, allowing unsafe reasoning to be masked by a safe-looking final answer. We propose Segment-aware Listwise Target DPO (SaLT-DPO), which addresses this gap through three mechanisms: (1) segment-aware listwise alignment that decomposes responses into reasoning and answer segments, independently scores each segment's safety, and aligns length-normalized segment rewards with soft target distributions over multiple candidates; (2) joint safety coherence regularization that applies a weakest-link principle to promote safety consistency across both segments; and (3) utility anchoring on benign prompts to mitigate over-refusal and reasoning degradation. Experiments on three LRMs show that SaLT-DPO consistently reduces unsafe rates for both reasoning and answer segments while mitigating degradation in benign compliance and preserving general reasoning performance. Ablation studies demonstrate the complementary contributions of its components.
Abstract:Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) pose a dual-surface safety challenge: both intermediate reasoning traces and final answers can contain harmful content. Existing alignment methods often operate at the whole-response level, allowing unsafe reasoning to be masked by a safe-looking final answer. We propose Segment-aware Listwise Target DPO (SaLT-DPO), which addresses this gap through three mechanisms: (1) segment-aware listwise alignment that decomposes responses into reasoning and answer segments, independently scores each segment's safety, and aligns length-normalized segment rewards with soft target distributions over multiple candidates; (2) joint safety coherence regularization that applies a weakest-link principle to promote safety consistency across both segments; and (3) utility anchoring on benign prompts to mitigate over-refusal and reasoning degradation. Experiments on three LRMs show that SaLT-DPO consistently reduces unsafe rates for both reasoning and answer segments while mitigating degradation in benign compliance and preserving general reasoning performance. Ablation studies demonstrate the complementary contributions of its components.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.15517 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.15517v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.15517 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 248 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · 6 aug. 2026

An unexamined cause of the OpenAI Hugging Face hacking incident: its binary performance metric
LessWrong · 23 sept. 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · 3 aug. 2026

Encoded Coordination on the Open Web
LessWrong · 23 sept. 2026