analiza aiqbench
This research dissects the root causes of loss spikes in Adam optimization by mapping training dynamics across momentum timescales and loss geometry. It establishes a linear boundary between stable and unstable regimes, linking these instabilities to superquadratic loss behaviors beyond standard Hessian approximations. These findings offer critical insights for improving optimizer stability in large-scale neural network training.
Beyond Quadratic Loss: The Stability Phase Diagram of Adam
arXiv:2609.18314v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Loss spikes are recurrent instabilities in neural-network training and can arise from multiple mechanisms. For Adam in particular, macroscopic loss spikes have been linked to optimizer dynamics, yet how its two momentum timescales govern them remains unclear. We investigate this dependence by mapping training dynamics across the $(\beta_1,\beta_2)$ plane. Across a range of model--task settings, an approximately linear boundary, $1-\beta_2=C(1-\beta_1)$, separates spiky from non-spiky dynamics, whereas a one-dimensional quadratic loss produces approximately cubic slope. A one-dimensional superquadratic loss $L(x)\propto|x|^n$ recovers the near-linear scaling and links the boundary coefficient to the effective loss exponent $n$. We further show that confident cross-entropy losses develop a core--wall landscape comprising a narrow quadratic core followed by a steep wall, which produces effective superquadratic behavior at the scale of an optimizer update. Together, these results connect Adam loss spikes to both the mismatch between momentum timescales and finite-scale superquadratic loss geometry beyond the Hessian.
Abstract:Loss spikes are recurrent instabilities in neural-network training and can arise from multiple mechanisms. For Adam in particular, macroscopic loss spikes have been linked to optimizer dynamics, yet how its two momentum timescales govern them remains unclear. We investigate this dependence by mapping training dynamics across the $(\beta_1,\beta_2)$ plane. Across a range of model--task settings, an approximately linear boundary, $1-\beta_2=C(1-\beta_1)$, separates spiky from non-spiky dynamics, whereas a one-dimensional quadratic loss produces approximately cubic slope. A one-dimensional superquadratic loss $L(x)\propto|x|^n$ recovers the near-linear scaling and links the boundary coefficient to the effective loss exponent $n$. We further show that confident cross-entropy losses develop a core--wall landscape comprising a narrow quadratic core followed by a steep wall, which produces effective superquadratic behavior at the scale of an optimizer update. Together, these results connect Adam loss spikes to both the mismatch between momentum timescales and finite-scale superquadratic loss geometry beyond the Hessian.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2609.18314 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.18314v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.18314 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 250 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

A brief history of quantum vs classical computational advantage
Quantum Journal · 1 sept. 2026

Quantifying mixed-state entanglement via partial transpose and realignment moments
Quantum Journal · 19 aug. 2026

Four-qubit entanglement sent over 29km of optical fiber
Quantum Zeitgeist · 1 oct. 2026
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026