Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This paper makes the learned driving policy differentiable through an identified vehicle model, so gradients flow from motion back to perception, and it replaces the hand-tuned tracking controller with a learned control decoder. The reported gains (driving score 86.7 on Bench2Drive, about 3.3 points above the cited baseline, plus lower jerk and fewer brake switches) come from one closed-loop benchmark, so generalization to other scenarios and real vehicles remains open. For ML readers, the transferable idea is training through a physics model with rate-consistent control parameterization.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Beyond Planning: Differentiable Control-in-the-loop End-to-End Autonomous Driving

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2610.18167v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: End-to-end autonomous driving has achieved remarkable progress by planning trajectories directly from raw sensor data. Yet the step from planning to control still relies on hand-tuned tracking controllers that block the gradient path from vehicle motion back to the network. This gap stems from non-differentiable vehicle dynamics, aliased supervision from coarsely sampled expert labels, rate mismatch between high-rate control and low-rate re-planning, and vehicle model discrepancies between training and deployment. This paper proposes DIVA (Differentiable Identified Vehicle dynamics for end-to-end Autonomous driving) to close this gap. An identified actuator-level vehicle model is embedded in the training loop of the end-to-end driving network, forming a differentiable chain from perception to vehicle states. A learning-based control decoder replaces the external controller and is supervised on the rolled-out vehicle states, bypassing the aliased control-input labels. A rate-consistent control-input parameterization reconciles the heterogeneous sampling rates and enables asynchronous execution with a 3.8 ms control-only cycle. On-policy re-identification and an online disturbance observer address training-time distribution shift and deployment-time model mismatch respectively. On the closed-loop Bench2Drive benchmark, DIVA achieves a driving score of 86.7, surpassing the widely adopted state-of-the-art approach by 3.3 points while nearly halving mean jerk and reducing brake switching by 64%, and maintains superior path tracking accuracy under significant vehicle model mismatch at deployment.

Abstract:End-to-end autonomous driving has achieved remarkable progress by planning trajectories directly from raw sensor data. Yet the step from planning to control still relies on hand-tuned tracking controllers that block the gradient path from vehicle motion back to the network. This gap stems from non-differentiable vehicle dynamics, aliased supervision from coarsely sampled expert labels, rate mismatch between high-rate control and low-rate re-planning, and vehicle model discrepancies between training and deployment. This paper proposes DIVA (Differentiable Identified Vehicle dynamics for end-to-end Autonomous driving) to close this gap. An identified actuator-level vehicle model is embedded in the training loop of the end-to-end driving network, forming a differentiable chain from perception to vehicle states. A learning-based control decoder replaces the external controller and is supervised on the rolled-out vehicle states, bypassing the aliased control-input labels. A rate-consistent control-input parameterization reconciles the heterogeneous sampling rates and enables asynchronous execution with a 3.8 ms control-only cycle. On-policy re-identification and an online disturbance observer address training-time distribution shift and deployment-time model mismatch respectively. On the closed-loop Bench2Drive benchmark, DIVA achieves a driving score of 86.7, surpassing the widely adopted state-of-the-art approach by 3.3 points while nearly halving mean jerk and reducing brake switching by 64%, and maintains superior path tracking accuracy under significant vehicle model mismatch at deployment.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2610.18167 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2610.18167v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.18167 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 305 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe