Sari la conținut

localeBeta.label localeBeta.notice localeBeta.readInEnglish

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This paper presents a specialized retrieval benchmark for *Dictyostelium*, addressing the limitations of general biomedical search models when applied to narrow model-organism domains with sparse literature. The study demonstrates that techniques like cross-encoder reranking and gene-aware query expansion significantly improve recall by mitigating vocabulary mismatches inherent in specific biological terminologies. While the application is domain-specific, the core contribution lies in advancing information retrieval methodologies for specialized scientific knowledge bases, which is a relevant subfield of machine learning applications in science.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Benchmarking Literature Retrieval for a Model Organism: A Dictyostelium Case Study

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2610.03130v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Biological literature retrieval systems are often developed and evaluated using broad biomedical corpora and general-purpose search tasks. However, many curated knowledge bases operate in narrower model-organism domains, where the literature is sparse and terminology is organism-specific. We introduce a retrieval benchmark from dictyBase for Dictyostelium, a model organism in cell and developmental biology. The benchmark consists of curator-generated biological queries linked to PubMed-indexed articles, together with structured gene annotations. Using this benchmark, we study three factors in niche biological retrieval: cross-encoder reranking, gene-aware query expansion, and abstract-only versus full-text retrieval. We report that reranking and gene-aware query expansion improve retrieval selectively: reranking is most useful when the model is well suited to biological evidence matching, whereas curated annotations help clarify compact biological queries by reducing vocabulary mismatch. Full-text chunks substantially improve retrieval when abstracts omit supporting evidence, increasing both candidate recall and top-rank performance, although these cases are harder than queries supported by abstracts. Data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/fulaibaowang/dictycite, and the benchmark dataset is additionally archived on Zenodo.

Abstract:Biological literature retrieval systems are often developed and evaluated using broad biomedical corpora and general-purpose search tasks. However, many curated knowledge bases operate in narrower model-organism domains, where the literature is sparse and terminology is organism-specific. We introduce a retrieval benchmark from dictyBase for Dictyostelium, a model organism in cell and developmental biology. The benchmark consists of curator-generated biological queries linked to PubMed-indexed articles, together with structured gene annotations. Using this benchmark, we study three factors in niche biological retrieval: cross-encoder reranking, gene-aware query expansion, and abstract-only versus full-text retrieval. We report that reranking and gene-aware query expansion improve retrieval selectively: reranking is most useful when the model is well suited to biological evidence matching, whereas curated annotations help clarify compact biological queries by reducing vocabulary mismatch. Full-text chunks substantially improve retrieval when abstracts omit supporting evidence, increasing both candidate recall and top-rank performance, although these cases are harder than queries supported by abstracts. Data and code are publicly available at this https URL, and the benchmark dataset is additionally archived on Zenodo.

15 pages, 5 figures. Submitted version (before peer review) of a paper accepted at Discovery Science 2026 (DS 2026); to appear in the Springer proceedings. Code and data: this https URL ; dataset: this https URL

Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2610.03130 [cs.IR]

(or arXiv:2610.03130v1 [cs.IR] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.03130 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 231 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe