Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCalcul cuantic

analiza aiqbench

The paper benchmarks cooling, adiabatic, and variational approaches to preparing ground states under depolarizing noise, using exactly solvable quadratic fermionic models so that the energy scaling can be derived analytically and then checked numerically. For readers tracking near-term quantum simulation, the useful question is how achievable energy degrades with noise rate and which method holds up best under realistic hardware constraints, not whether any single algorithm is a breakthrough.
Surse care acoperăJournal of Quantum (JQUANT), SISSA, Quantum Zeitgeist, PrincInt, arXiv

Benchmark of quantum algorithms for ground state preparation in the presence of noise

Journal of Quantum (JQUANT), SISSA84 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

We compare the performance of representative cooling, adiabatic, and optimization algorithms for ground-state preparation in the presence of noise. Using an exactly solvable family of quadratic fermionic Hamiltonians subject to depolarizing noise, we derive the scaling of the achievable relative energy as a function of the noise rate and support these results with numerical simulations. The [...]

Preparing ground states of many-body Hamiltonians is a central task in quantum simulation and computation. Various strategies have been developed, including adiabatic evolution [3], variational algorithms, such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) [2, 4, 5], and dissipative or cooling protocols [1, 6–21]. In current experimental settings, all these approaches are limited by the presence of noise, including decoherence and imperfections, which degrades the quality of the prepared states and imposes limits on the reachable energies. Thus, the following questions naturally arise: how does the achievable energy scale with the noise rate, and which strategy performs best for given hardware constraints? The adiabatic algorithm [3] prepares the target ground state by slowly evolving the system from the ground state of a simple initial Hamiltonian to the target Hamiltonian, relying on the adiabatic theorem to keep the state close to the instantaneous ground state throughout the evolution. Its performance is often limited by the minimum spectral gap along the interpolation path, which closes at quantum phase transitions and demands impractically long runtimes [22, 23]. Variational algorithms such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) [2, 5] circumvent some of those issues by optimizing the parameters of a fixed-depth quantum circuit…

Extras afișat conform termenilor RSS ai publicației · 200 cuvinte · textul integral și figurile sunt pe site-ul publicației

Subiecte conexe