analiza aiqbench
This research introduces Jacobian centroids as a novel method for monitoring behavioral alignment in JEPA world models, offering an efficient way to detect internal representation failures before planning errors occur. By identifying structural dissociations between encoders and predictors, the technique enables proactive goal resampling to handle distribution shifts without relying solely on traditional activation signals. These findings advance the reliability of autonomous agents by providing a computationally lightweight tool for real-time safety monitoring in complex control tasks.
Behavioral Monitoring of JEPA World Models with Jacobian Centroids
arXiv:2609.33940v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Detecting failures in World Model (WM)-based planning requires monitoring whether the model is behaviorally aligned with the current task, which in turn requires studying its internal representations. Here, we show that centroids---sub-component Jacobian row-sums---effectively identify the behavioral properties of WMs, complementing traditional activation-based knowledge signals. The centroids of a model are easily computed through Jacobian vector products and characterize how the model organizes the geometry of its input space, yielding an efficient perspective on internal representations, including the generation of task-relevant saliency maps. Evaluated on continuous control tasks using JEPA WMs, this behavioral view reveals a structural dissociation, where the encoder correctly represents the goal while the predictor remains behaviorally unresponsive. This failure mode directly predicts planning failure before any action is taken, allowing for goal resampling to recapture out-of-distribution success. Moreover, centroid-based methods outperform baseline methods as distribution-shift detectors. Together, these tools yield a behavioral monitoring stack that is operational and consequential under distribution shifts.
Abstract:Detecting failures in World Model (WM)-based planning requires monitoring whether the model is behaviorally aligned with the current task, which in turn requires studying its internal representations. Here, we show that centroids---sub-component Jacobian row-sums---effectively identify the behavioral properties of WMs, complementing traditional activation-based knowledge signals. The centroids of a model are easily computed through Jacobian vector products and characterize how the model organizes the geometry of its input space, yielding an efficient perspective on internal representations, including the generation of task-relevant saliency maps. Evaluated on continuous control tasks using JEPA WMs, this behavioral view reveals a structural dissociation, where the encoder correctly represents the goal while the predictor remains behaviorally unresponsive. This failure mode directly predicts planning failure before any action is taken, allowing for goal resampling to recapture out-of-distribution success. Moreover, centroid-based methods outperform baseline methods as distribution-shift detectors. Together, these tools yield a behavioral monitoring stack that is operational and consequential under distribution shifts.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.33940 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.33940v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.33940 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 250 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] Fal’s H3 Max Live breaks the infinite videogen barrier
Latent Space · 1 sept. 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · 23 sept. 2026

Import AI 470: No rights for machines; automating environment generation with SPADE; and building better GPU kernels with Hawkeye
Import AI · 24 aug. 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · 27 iul. 2026