analiza aiqbench
BEAR-Bench introduces a critical evaluation framework addressing the gap in assessing Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on complex, text-dense professional documents across English and Russian. By testing 16 models against human-annotated questions derived from business and scientific papers, this benchmark reveals significant room for improvement in reasoning capabilities even among state-of-the-art systems. Furthermore, the study provides a comparative analysis of hallucination detection methods based on these model failures, offering essential insights for improving reliability in enterprise AI applications.
BEAR-Bench: A Bilingual Enterprise and Academic Reasoning Benchmark for Multimodal Models
arXiv:2608.17895v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have made significant strides in visual comprehension, their ability to reason about text-dense, professional documents remains incompletely evaluated. Existing benchmarks emphasize information extraction, require external domain knowledge, or cover professional documents only as one of many settings. They are also largely English- or Chinese-centric, leaving other languages and Russian, in particular, substantially underrepresented. To address these limitations, we introduce BEAR-Bench (Bilingual Enterprise and Academic Reasoning), a self-contained, complex English-and-Russian benchmark comprising 1000 human-annotated questions based on text-rich business and scientific documents. We evaluate 16 proprietary and open-weight MLLMs, including Gemini 3.1 Pro and Qwen3.5-397B, on BEAR-Bench and observe clear headroom even for the strongest systems. Finally, we use the resulting model outputs to compare existing hallucination detection methods, evaluating not only how often models fail on BEAR-Bench but also how reliably those failures can be identified.
Abstract:While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have made significant strides in visual comprehension, their ability to reason about text-dense, professional documents remains incompletely evaluated. Existing benchmarks emphasize information extraction, require external domain knowledge, or cover professional documents only as one of many settings. They are also largely English- or Chinese-centric, leaving other languages and Russian, in particular, substantially underrepresented. To address these limitations, we introduce BEAR-Bench (Bilingual Enterprise and Academic Reasoning), a self-contained, complex English-and-Russian benchmark comprising 1000 human-annotated questions based on text-rich business and scientific documents. We evaluate 16 proprietary and open-weight MLLMs, including Gemini 3.1 Pro and Qwen3.5-397B, on BEAR-Bench and observe clear headroom even for the strongest systems. Finally, we use the resulting model outputs to compare existing hallucination detection methods, evaluating not only how often models fail on BEAR-Bench but also how reliably those failures can be identified.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.17895 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.17895v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.17895 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 240 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · 17 oct. 2026

[AINews] Agents disprove Polysemanticity; greatly improve Interpretability & Alignment
Latent Space · 16 oct. 2026
[AINews] Modal’s $1B ARR, $16B Series D makes it NYC’s newest AI Infra Decacorn, 3x usage and 3x valuation in 5 months, 15x in 1 yr
Latent Space · 15 oct. 2026

34 Amazon Research Awards Build on Trainium recipients announced
Amazon Science · 5 aug. 2026