analiza aiqbench
This research demonstrates the superiority of Bayesian Distributional Active Learning (DALE) and Distributional Latent Variable Models (DLVM) over conventional estimation methods in sparse data regimes, offering a principled approach for efficient cognitive assessment. By leveraging cross-task inference and adaptive sampling to maximize information gain, these models provide a robust framework for handling incomplete datasets in complex behavioral modeling.
Bayesian Distributional Models of Executive Functioning
arXiv:2510.00387v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This study uses controlled simulations with known ground-truth parameters to evaluate how Distributional Latent Variable Models (DLVM) and Bayesian Distributional Active LEarning (DALE) perform in comparison to conventional Independent Maximum Likelihood Estimation (IMLE). DLVM integrates observations across multiple executive function tasks and individuals, allowing parameter estimation even under sparse or incomplete data conditions. To establish known-ground truth, we uniformly sample individual sessions from a neural network learned latent space and map them to distributional cognitive performance across different tasks. The individual test-items are then sampled from these distributions using either DALE, random procedure or a standard fixed battery approach. When given the same set of observations, DLVM consistently outperformed IMLE, especially under smaller amounts of data, and converges faster to highly accurate estimates of the true distributions. In a second set of analyses, DALE adaptively guided sampling to maximize information gain, outperforming random sampling and fixed test batteries, particularly within the first 80 trials. These findings establish the advantages of combining DLVM's cross-task inference with DALE's optimal adaptive sampling, providing a principled basis for more efficient cognitive assessments.
Abstract:This study uses controlled simulations with known ground-truth parameters to evaluate how Distributional Latent Variable Models (DLVM) and Bayesian Distributional Active LEarning (DALE) perform in comparison to conventional Independent Maximum Likelihood Estimation (IMLE). DLVM integrates observations across multiple executive function tasks and individuals, allowing parameter estimation even under sparse or incomplete data conditions. To establish known-ground truth, we uniformly sample individual sessions from a neural network learned latent space and map them to distributional cognitive performance across different tasks. The individual test-items are then sampled from these distributions using either DALE, random procedure or a standard fixed battery approach. When given the same set of observations, DLVM consistently outperformed IMLE, especially under smaller amounts of data, and converges faster to highly accurate estimates of the true distributions. In a second set of analyses, DALE adaptively guided sampling to maximize information gain, outperforming random sampling and fixed test batteries, particularly within the first 80 trials. These findings establish the advantages of combining DLVM's cross-task inference with DALE's optimal adaptive sampling, providing a principled basis for more efficient cognitive assessments.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
arXiv:2510.00387 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2510.00387v5 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.00387 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 273 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · 30 iul. 2026

The Alignment Problem: Computer Science Meets Analytic Philosophy
LessWrong · 18 oct. 2026

Generalization and infinite width
LessWrong · 1 aug. 2026

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · 6 aug. 2026