Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This research presents a hybrid control framework that combines neural network guidance with differentiable reaction-diffusion substrates for embodied morphogenesis. The study demonstrates that brief, parameter-level nudges can achieve strict convergence while drastically reducing computational cost compared to purely neural or fully distributed approaches. This work advances the understanding of how top-down learning and bottom-up self-organization can be effectively balanced in complex generative systems.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Balancing Centralized Learning and Distributed Self-Organization: A Hybrid Model for Embodied Morphogenesis

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2511.10101v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Background: both embodied intelligence and developmental morphogenesis depend on a division of labour between centralized guidance and distributed material dynamics, but the amount of top-down control needed to steer self-organization remains unclear. Methods: we coupled a compact full-resolution convolutional controller to a differentiable Gray-Scott reaction-diffusion (RD) substrate. The controller observes two fields, U and V, and applies smooth gain-scheduled modulations of the feed and kill parameters (Delta F and Delta K). We compared pure RD, neural network (NN)-dominant and hybrid regimes and evaluated spectral selectivity, convergence and control cost. Results: the hybrid regime achieved 100% strict convergence at approximately 165 steps, whereas pure RD and the NN-dominant baseline did not converge within the same horizon. It matched the substrate's spectral selectivity while using approximately 15 times less L1 effort and over 200 times less L2 power than the NN-dominant controller. Moderate amplitudes (A approximately 0.03-0.045) formed a Goldilocks zone with 100% quasi-convergence in 94-96 steps. Conclusions: effective control is best framed as seed then cede: brief, smooth parameter-level nudges place the system in a favourable basin of attraction, after which reaction-diffusion dynamics complete and stabilize the pattern. This provides a quantitative model of morphological computation for controlled self-organization.

Abstract:Background: both embodied intelligence and developmental morphogenesis depend on a division of labour between centralized guidance and distributed material dynamics, but the amount of top-down control needed to steer self-organization remains unclear. Methods: we coupled a compact full-resolution convolutional controller to a differentiable Gray-Scott reaction-diffusion (RD) substrate. The controller observes two fields, U and V, and applies smooth gain-scheduled modulations of the feed and kill parameters (Delta F and Delta K). We compared pure RD, neural network (NN)-dominant and hybrid regimes and evaluated spectral selectivity, convergence and control cost. Results: the hybrid regime achieved 100% strict convergence at approximately 165 steps, whereas pure RD and the NN-dominant baseline did not converge within the same horizon. It matched the substrate's spectral selectivity while using approximately 15 times less L1 effort and over 200 times less L2 power than the NN-dominant controller. Moderate amplitudes (A approximately 0.03-0.045) formed a Goldilocks zone with 100% quasi-convergence in 94-96 steps. Conclusions: effective control is best framed as seed then cede: brief, smooth parameter-level nudges place the system in a favourable basin of attraction, after which reaction-diffusion dynamics complete and stabilize the pattern. This provides a quantitative model of morphological computation for controlled self-organization.

Replaced with the peer-reviewed Version of Record published in Royal Society Open Science 13, 252327 (2026). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.252327

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2511.10101 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2511.10101v2 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.10101 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

R. Soc. Open Sci. 13 (2026) 252327

https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.252327 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 325 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe