analiza aiqbench
This research addresses the fragility of modern neural network training by introducing a supervisory runtime framework capable of automatically detecting and recovering from destabilizing updates. By treating optimization as a controlled stochastic process, the method offers theoretical safety guarantees with minimal overhead without requiring changes to existing optimizers. This advancement is critical for ensuring robustness in large-scale AI development where silent performance degradation can be costly.
Automatic Stability and Recovery for Neural Network Training
arXiv:2601.17483v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Training modern neural networks is increasingly fragile, with rare but severe destabilizing updates often causing irreversible divergence or silent performance degradation. Existing optimization methods primarily rely on preventive mechanisms embedded within the optimizer, offering limited ability to detect and recover from instability once it occurs. We introduce a supervisory runtime stability framework that treats optimization as a controlled stochastic process. By isolating an innovation signal derived from secondary measurements, such as validation probes, the framework enables automatic detection and recovery from destabilizing updates without modifying the underlying optimizer. We provide theoretical runtime safety guarantees that formalize bounded degradation and recovery. Our implementation incurs minimal overhead and is compatible with memory-constrained training settings.
Abstract:Training modern neural networks is increasingly fragile, with rare but severe destabilizing updates often causing irreversible divergence or silent performance degradation. Existing optimization methods primarily rely on preventive mechanisms embedded within the optimizer, offering limited ability to detect and recover from instability once it occurs. We introduce a supervisory runtime stability framework that treats optimization as a controlled stochastic process. By isolating an innovation signal derived from secondary measurements, such as validation probes, the framework enables automatic detection and recovery from destabilizing updates without modifying the underlying optimizer. We provide theoretical runtime safety guarantees that formalize bounded degradation and recovery. Our implementation incurs minimal overhead and is compatible with memory-constrained training settings.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2601.17483 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2601.17483v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.17483 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 207 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026

Multi-Region training with Amazon SageMaker HyperPod and Qumulo
AWS · 25 sept. 2026
A Physics-Inspired Optimizer: Velocity Regularized Adam
arXiv · 12 iun. 2026
Reliable mechanistic operator recovery with biologically-informed neural networks: principles for architecture and optimisation design
arXiv · 5 oct. 2026