analiza aiqbench
This research demonstrates that automated generation of specialized word lists from target texts achieves 95% vocabulary coverage with significantly fewer words than general service lists. By relying on objective criteria rather than subjective linguistic expertise, this approach offers a scalable solution for language learning applications. The method effectively reduces resource intensity while maintaining high comprehension thresholds across diverse text genres.
Automated Lexical Coverage for Language Learning: From General to Specialized Word Lists
arXiv:2512.15552v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A General Service List (GSL) is a commonly used resource for language learners to identify important English words. Traditional GSL creation is resource-intensive, relying on linguistic expertise and subjective input. We created our own GSL and evaluated its performance against the New General Service List (NGSL). We found that creating a Specialized Word List (SWL), tailored to a specific text, is a practical method for language learners. Because an SWL is derived from the target text itself, it reaches the 95% coverage required for language comprehension by construction, and it does so with substantially fewer words than a general list applied to the same text: across nine texts spanning fiction, academic papers, and scripts, the NGSL covered 64-85% of each text, whereas a text-specific list reached 95% with far smaller vocabularies. By restricting the SWL process to objective criteria only, it can be automated, scaled, and tailored to the needs of language-learners across the globe.
Abstract:A General Service List (GSL) is a commonly used resource for language learners to identify important English words. Traditional GSL creation is resource-intensive, relying on linguistic expertise and subjective input. We created our own GSL and evaluated its performance against the New General Service List (NGSL). We found that creating a Specialized Word List (SWL), tailored to a specific text, is a practical method for language learners. Because an SWL is derived from the target text itself, it reaches the 95% coverage required for language comprehension by construction, and it does so with substantially fewer words than a general list applied to the same text: across nine texts spanning fiction, academic papers, and scripts, the NGSL covered 64-85% of each text, whereas a text-specific list reached 95% with far smaller vocabularies. By restricting the SWL process to objective criteria only, it can be automated, scaled, and tailored to the needs of language-learners across the globe.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2512.15552 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2512.15552v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.15552 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 248 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Automation’s Early Footprint
Cohere · 3 sept. 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026
A Specialized Large Multimodal Model for Interpreting PET/CT in Head and Neck Cancer
arXiv · 9 sept. 2026
AutoPDEBench: Benchmarking LLM Auto-Research for Neural PDE Solver Design
arXiv · 29 sept. 2026