Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This paper rigorously audits HuggingBench, revealing critical data integrity flaws in knowledge graph identifiers that invalidate prior recommendation results. By correcting these identity constraints and optimizing training protocols, the authors demonstrate significant performance gains while highlighting the necessity of treating benchmark datasets as high-stakes data products requiring strict provenance management.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv

Auditing a Model-Hub Benchmark: Data Quality, Training Budgets, and Side Information in HuggingBench

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2611.03727v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Benchmarks built from model hubs combine interaction data, knowledge graphs (KGs) and resource documentation, but valid files do not ensure that these artifacts describe the same objects. Treating the release as a data product, we audit HuggingBench (SIGIR 2025), a benchmark for recommending Hugging Face resources, through data validation, a replication of its eleven recommendation methods and controlled experiments with three training seeds. In three of its four external KGs, the files pass key and range checks but violate the item-entity identity constraint on which KG recommenders rely. Correcting this join improves every KG-based method in every seed, by up to 73% in mean Recall@10, and consistently reverses ten of 27 comparisons between KG configurations. The protocol matters as well: the 100-epoch budget ends before early stopping in seven to eight of 29 validation-selected settings, and 21 of 23 such setting-seed pairs improve with a longer budget. The released item text, which no reported method uses, is the strongest signal: closed-form linear models with text and the item graph exceed the best reported Recall@10 by 18% while fitting in minutes on a CPU. Checks of other recommendation releases show that individually valid releases of one dataset can use incompatible identifiers. We release corrected files, mappings, validators and logs, and derive practices for preserving identity and provenance across the artifacts of benchmarks and model lakes.

Abstract:Benchmarks built from model hubs combine interaction data, knowledge graphs (KGs) and resource documentation, but valid files do not ensure that these artifacts describe the same objects. Treating the release as a data product, we audit HuggingBench (SIGIR 2025), a benchmark for recommending Hugging Face resources, through data validation, a replication of its eleven recommendation methods and controlled experiments with three training seeds. In three of its four external KGs, the files pass key and range checks but violate the item-entity identity constraint on which KG recommenders rely. Correcting this join improves every KG-based method in every seed, by up to 73% in mean Recall@10, and consistently reverses ten of 27 comparisons between KG configurations. The protocol matters as well: the 100-epoch budget ends before early stopping in seven to eight of 29 validation-selected settings, and 21 of 23 such setting-seed pairs improve with a longer budget. The released item text, which no reported method uses, is the strongest signal: closed-form linear models with text and the item graph exceed the best reported Recall@10 by 18% while fitting in minutes on a CPU. Checks of other recommendation releases show that individually valid releases of one dataset can use incompatible identifiers. We release corrected files, mappings, validators and logs, and derive practices for preserving identity and provenance across the artifacts of benchmarks and model lakes.

12 pages, 10 tables, 2 figures. Code and data: this https URL

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2611.03727 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2611.03727v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.03727 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 330 cuvinte