analiza aiqbench
This research introduces ASAT, a human-in-the-loop framework designed to dynamically adjust scoring functions and thresholds for out-of-distribution detection in machine learning models. By incorporating real-world feedback, the method effectively controls false positive rates while adapting to evolving data distributions without sacrificing true positive performance. This advancement is critical for deploying reliable AI systems in safety-critical applications where managing uncertainty during deployment phases is essential.
ASAT: Adaptive Scoring and Thresholding with Human Feedback for Robust Out-of-Distribution Detection
arXiv:2505.02299v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Machine Learning (ML) models are trained on in-distribution (ID) data but often encounter out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs during deployment---posing serious risks in safety-critical domains. Recent works have focused on designing scoring functions to quantify OOD uncertainty, with score thresholds typically set based solely on ID data to achieve a target true positive rate (TPR), since OOD data is limited before deployment. However, these TPR-based thresholds leave false positive rates (FPR) uncontrolled, often resulting in high FPRs where OOD points are misclassified as ID. Moreover, fixed scoring functions and thresholds lack the adaptivity needed to handle newly observed, evolving OOD inputs, leading to sub-optimal performance. To address these challenges, we propose \emph{ASAT}, a human-in-the-loop framework that \textit{safely updates both scoring functions and thresholds on the fly} based on real-world OOD inputs. ASAT maximizes TPR while controlling FPR at all times under stationary conditions, even as the system adapts over time. Under nonstationary conditions, the method adapts to distribution shifts with only transient FPR violations during the adaptation period. We provide theoretical guarantees for FPR control under stationary conditions and present extensive empirical evaluations on OpenOOD benchmarks to demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing methods by achieving higher TPRs while maintaining FPR control.
Abstract:Machine Learning (ML) models are trained on in-distribution (ID) data but often encounter out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs during deployment---posing serious risks in safety-critical domains. Recent works have focused on designing scoring functions to quantify OOD uncertainty, with score thresholds typically set based solely on ID data to achieve a target true positive rate (TPR), since OOD data is limited before deployment. However, these TPR-based thresholds leave false positive rates (FPR) uncontrolled, often resulting in high FPRs where OOD points are misclassified as ID. Moreover, fixed scoring functions and thresholds lack the adaptivity needed to handle newly observed, evolving OOD inputs, leading to sub-optimal performance. To address these challenges, we propose \emph{ASAT}, a human-in-the-loop framework that \textit{safely updates both scoring functions and thresholds on the fly} based on real-world OOD inputs. ASAT maximizes TPR while controlling FPR at all times under stationary conditions, even as the system adapts over time. Under nonstationary conditions, the method adapts to distribution shifts with only transient FPR violations during the adaptation period. We provide theoretical guarantees for FPR control under stationary conditions and present extensive empirical evaluations on OpenOOD benchmarks to demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing methods by achieving higher TPRs while maintaining FPR control.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2505.02299 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2505.02299v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.02299 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 295 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Deconfusing Corrigibility
AI Alignment Forum · 17 oct. 2026

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · 21 iul. 2026
Construct validity of Claude Opus 4.8's System Card – A commentary
LessWrong · 12 iun. 2026

Jev: System One models for Prod, not God — with Diogo Almeida, CEO, TypeSafe AI
Latent Space · 21 sept. 2026