analiza aiqbench
The paper uses a learned agent to choose, per image pair, which PIV estimator and preprocessing configuration to run under a speed budget. Reported gains are 12.2-22.4% lower endpoint error than the best single estimator at matched speed, and a simulated closed-loop regulation task shows about 13 points lower normalized cost. These results come from simulation and a single tabletop water channel, so the real-world benefit for closed-loop flow control is not yet established. Readers interested in algorithm selection or RL-based control should note the speed-accuracy trade-offs and the physical experiment's scope.
ART of PIV: Agentic Real-Time Particle Image Velocimetry for Active Flow Control
arXiv:2610.41304v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Particle image velocimetry (PIV) measures fluid motion from images of tracer particles, but its accuracy depends on choices throughout the estimation pipeline, including image preprocessing, flow estimation, and postprocessing. These choices are typically left to expert tuning, and a fixed configuration can become less accurate as conditions change. This matters especially when PIV supplies feedback for real-time control, where measurements must be both accurate and fast, and flow conditions vary. We introduce ART of PIV -- short for Agentic Real-Time and also a nod to the art of tuning a PIV pipeline -- which automates pipeline choice for each image pair. A learned agent selects a configuration according to a chosen measurement objective from a library assembled for a specified speed budget. Across cross-correlation, classical optical-flow, and learning-based estimators, ART of PIV reduces average end-point error (AEPE) by 12.2-22.4 % relative to the best single estimator at matched speed, with gains extending to 1000-4000 image pair/s. In a simulated local velocity regulation task, it reduces mean normalized closed-loop cost by 13.24-13.59 percentage points relative to a tuned fixed estimator, with the same classical controller in both cases. In a tabletop water channel, we illustrate two ways to tune ART of PIV for a fluidic pinball of three rotating cylinders: selecting between complementary optical-flow tunings for accuracy, and selecting regions of interest with coherent rotation or shear using a common flow estimator. For the first variant, we train a DreamerV3 reinforcement learning controller directly in the physical world and demonstrate tracking of a prescribed flow field in the wake of a fluidic pinball.
Abstract:Particle image velocimetry (PIV) measures fluid motion from images of tracer particles, but its accuracy depends on choices throughout the estimation pipeline, including image preprocessing, flow estimation, and postprocessing. These choices are typically left to expert tuning, and a fixed configuration can become less accurate as conditions change. This matters especially when PIV supplies feedback for real-time control, where measurements must be both accurate and fast, and flow conditions vary. We introduce ART of PIV -- short for Agentic Real-Time and also a nod to the art of tuning a PIV pipeline -- which automates pipeline choice for each image pair. A learned agent selects a configuration according to a chosen measurement objective from a library assembled for a specified speed budget. Across cross-correlation, classical optical-flow, and learning-based estimators, ART of PIV reduces average end-point error (AEPE) by 12.2-22.4 % relative to the best single estimator at matched speed, with gains extending to 1000-4000 image pair/s. In a simulated local velocity regulation task, it reduces mean normalized closed-loop cost by 13.24-13.59 percentage points relative to a tuned fixed estimator, with the same classical controller in both cases. In a tabletop water channel, we illustrate two ways to tune ART of PIV for a fluidic pinball of three rotating cylinders: selecting between complementary optical-flow tunings for accuracy, and selecting regions of interest with coherent rotation or shear using a common flow estimator. For the first variant, we train a DreamerV3 reinforcement learning controller directly in the physical world and demonstrate tracking of a prescribed flow field in the wake of a fluidic pinball.
Fluid Dynamics (physics.flu-dyn); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
arXiv:2610.41304 [physics.flu-dyn]
(or arXiv:2610.41304v1 [physics.flu-dyn] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.41304 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 365 cuvinte