analiza aiqbench
This research introduces the Agentic Reward System (ARS), a framework that leverages general-purpose vision-language models to accurately estimate robot task progress without requiring additional reward-model training. By employing a multi-agent verification process, ARS effectively filters out spurious signals from failed attempts or irrelevant actions, significantly improving policy learning in both simulation and real-world robotic assembly tasks. The approach demonstrates how structured inference can enhance the reliability of offline reinforcement learning for complex, long-horizon physical operations.
ARS: Agentic Reward System for Robot Learning
arXiv:2609.34484v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Progress reward modeling is the problem of estimating how a robot's behavior changes task progress over time. Reliable estimation requires distinguishing meaningful state changes from failed attempts and task-irrelevant actions. We introduce the Agentic Reward System (ARS), an inference framework for progress reward modeling with general-purpose vision-language models (VLMs), without additional reward-model training. Given an offline trajectory and a task instruction, ARS uses adaptive visual inspection for both event proposal and verification. A subagent proposes a task-relevant event timeline, which a primary agent verifies and revises before estimating per-frame progress. ARS can incorporate optional terminal outcome labels and visual references to inform its judgments. It can also audit progress estimates from external reward models. We evaluate ARS with a 27B VLM on a controlled semantic-mismatch benchmark and downstream policy learning in simulation and on a real robot. The benchmark reveals that several evaluated reward baselines assign spurious progress to wrong-object manipulation even in simple pick-and-place scenes. ARS better suppresses these errors and outperforms these baselines in simulation policy learning. We further demonstrate that ARS supports long-horizon policy learning from mixed-quality offline experience on real-robot multi-screw fastening in a full-scale laboratory replica of an industrial washing-machine assembly line. These results suggest that structured inference and verification can improve the usefulness of general-purpose VLMs for robot reward modeling. Code is at https://github.com/midea-ai/ars
Abstract:Progress reward modeling is the problem of estimating how a robot's behavior changes task progress over time. Reliable estimation requires distinguishing meaningful state changes from failed attempts and task-irrelevant actions. We introduce the Agentic Reward System (ARS), an inference framework for progress reward modeling with general-purpose vision-language models (VLMs), without additional reward-model training. Given an offline trajectory and a task instruction, ARS uses adaptive visual inspection for both event proposal and verification. A subagent proposes a task-relevant event timeline, which a primary agent verifies and revises before estimating per-frame progress. ARS can incorporate optional terminal outcome labels and visual references to inform its judgments. It can also audit progress estimates from external reward models. We evaluate ARS with a 27B VLM on a controlled semantic-mismatch benchmark and downstream policy learning in simulation and on a real robot. The benchmark reveals that several evaluated reward baselines assign spurious progress to wrong-object manipulation even in simple pick-and-place scenes. ARS better suppresses these errors and outperforms these baselines in simulation policy learning. We further demonstrate that ARS supports long-horizon policy learning from mixed-quality offline experience on real-robot multi-screw fastening in a full-scale laboratory replica of an industrial washing-machine assembly line. These results suggest that structured inference and verification can improve the usefulness of general-purpose VLMs for robot reward modeling. Code is at this https URL
Robotics (cs.RO); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.34484 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.34484v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.34484 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 318 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Humanity’s Last Invention — Richard Socher of Recursive
Latent Space · 14 sept. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026

The Alignment Problem: Computer Science Meets Analytic Philosophy
AI Alignment Forum · 18 oct. 2026
Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026