analiza aiqbench
This paper introduces ApplE, a modular ontology designed to formalize applied ethics and event context for machine-interpretable ethical reasoning. By integrating abstract moral principles with specific domain scenarios like healthcare, the framework aims to enhance transparency and consistency in autonomous decision-making systems. It represents foundational work in aligning AI behavior with structured human values through knowledge representation techniques rather than standard model training.
ApplE: A Modular Ontology of Applied Ethics and Event Context for Ethical Decision Modeling
arXiv:2502.05110v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Applied ethics applies ethical decision-making to domain-specific contexts using contextual information such as agents, actions, temporal and spatial settings, and theoretical constructs such as utility, virtues, rights, and duties. However, representing an ethical decision is challenging as it may be abstract, context-sensitive, and semantically heterogeneous. Nevertheless, important ethical and contextual factors can be formally modeled to support structured ethical reasoning. Knowledge representation and reasoning provide a mechanism to translate abstract ethical concepts into machine-interpretable conceptual structures in the context of an event. To achieve this, we propose ApplE, an Applied Ethics ontology that models ethical theory and event context within a unified and modular conceptual framework for ethical decision-making. The ontology was developed using a modified version of the Simplified Agile Methodology for Ontology Development (SAMOD), which facilitates iterative refinement of classes and relationships, as well as the participation of a domain expert. The modular development of ApplE combines Ethics Theory with Event Context to capture semantic relationships between ethical principles, agents, actions, consequences, intentions, and domains. Using ApplE, we modeled a use case from the medical domain to demonstrate the ontology's representational expressivity and reasoning capabilities. In addition to ontological reasoning and consistency checks, ApplE is also evaluated using the three-fold testing process of SAMOD. ApplE follows the FAIR principles and is positioned to be used as a reusable semantic and conceptual modeling resource for ethical AI systems and ontology-driven applications.
Abstract:Applied ethics applies ethical decision-making to domain-specific contexts using contextual information such as agents, actions, temporal and spatial settings, and theoretical constructs such as utility, virtues, rights, and duties. However, representing an ethical decision is challenging as it may be abstract, context-sensitive, and semantically heterogeneous. Nevertheless, important ethical and contextual factors can be formally modeled to support structured ethical reasoning. Knowledge representation and reasoning provide a mechanism to translate abstract ethical concepts into machine-interpretable conceptual structures in the context of an event. To achieve this, we propose ApplE, an Applied Ethics ontology that models ethical theory and event context within a unified and modular conceptual framework for ethical decision-making. The ontology was developed using a modified version of the Simplified Agile Methodology for Ontology Development (SAMOD), which facilitates iterative refinement of classes and relationships, as well as the participation of a domain expert. The modular development of ApplE combines Ethics Theory with Event Context to capture semantic relationships between ethical principles, agents, actions, consequences, intentions, and domains. Using ApplE, we modeled a use case from the medical domain to demonstrate the ontology's representational expressivity and reasoning capabilities. In addition to ontological reasoning and consistency checks, ApplE is also evaluated using the three-fold testing process of SAMOD. ApplE follows the FAIR principles and is positioned to be used as a reusable semantic and conceptual modeling resource for ethical AI systems and ontology-driven applications.
Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2502.05110 [cs.CY]
(or arXiv:2502.05110v2 [cs.CY] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.05110 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 328 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026

Podcast: Scott Jenson on Evolving Desktop OS, Local-First, & Agentic UX
InfoQ · 31 aug. 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · 13 oct. 2026

The basic argument for making AI better at moral philosophy
LessWrong · 14 oct. 2026