Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchProduse AI

analiza aiqbench

This study benchmarks unsupervised anomaly detection methods for vision-based tactile sensing, offering practical guidance on sensor wear limits and resolution trade-offs for inspecting small industrial parts. By converting contact imprints into image-like data compatible with standard deep-learning pipelines, the work establishes a viable alternative to optical cameras where geometry-driven defects are poorly resolved.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Anomaly Detection on Small Industrial Components via Vision-Based Tactile Sensing

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2608.30506v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated inspection of small industrial components, including sub-centimetre-scale parts where defects are geometry-driven and poorly resolved by standard optical cameras, calls for sensing modalities that can directly capture fine surface geometry. Vision-based tactile sensors address this need by converting contact imprints into high-resolution image-like data compatible with existing deep-learning pipelines, yet their effective use for industrial anomaly detection (AD) remains largely unexplored. This work systematically evaluates unsupervised AD methods on a real tactile dataset covering five genuine industrial components acquired with a GelSight Mini sensor mounted on a collaborative robot. Four feature-embedding methods, SPADE, PaDiM, FAPM, and InReaCh, are compared under three validations explicitly motivated by the deployment constraints of contact-based sensing: a Good Fraction analysis establishing the minimum number of nominal contacts for stable performance, directly bounded by gel wear since every acquisition degrades the soft interface; a cross-position evaluation assessing generalization across different contact locations observing the same recurring surface pattern; and a low- versus high-resolution comparison evaluating the cost-benefit of higher-resolution tactile acquisition. Overall, this systematic benchmarking study provides practical guidance for researchers and practitioners adopting vision-based tactile sensing for industrial AD and shows how this modality can serve as a viable alternative for industrial quality-control tasks.

Abstract:Automated inspection of small industrial components, including sub-centimetre-scale parts where defects are geometry-driven and poorly resolved by standard optical cameras, calls for sensing modalities that can directly capture fine surface geometry. Vision-based tactile sensors address this need by converting contact imprints into high-resolution image-like data compatible with existing deep-learning pipelines, yet their effective use for industrial anomaly detection (AD) remains largely unexplored. This work systematically evaluates unsupervised AD methods on a real tactile dataset covering five genuine industrial components acquired with a GelSight Mini sensor mounted on a collaborative robot. Four feature-embedding methods, SPADE, PaDiM, FAPM, and InReaCh, are compared under three validations explicitly motivated by the deployment constraints of contact-based sensing: a Good Fraction analysis establishing the minimum number of nominal contacts for stable performance, directly bounded by gel wear since every acquisition degrades the soft interface; a cross-position evaluation assessing generalization across different contact locations observing the same recurring surface pattern; and a low- versus high-resolution comparison evaluating the cost-benefit of higher-resolution tactile acquisition. Overall, this systematic benchmarking study provides practical guidance for researchers and practitioners adopting vision-based tactile sensing for industrial AD and shows how this modality can serve as a viable alternative for industrial quality-control tasks.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2608.30506 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2608.30506v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.30506 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 293 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe