analiza aiqbench
ANNEAL addresses a critical gap in LLM agent reliability by repairing underlying symbolic process knowledge rather than merely updating prompts or model weights. By converting recurring execution failures into governed edits of a process knowledge graph with full provenance and rollback capabilities, the system eliminates persistent fault rates that other methods fail to resolve. This approach establishes a complementary paradigm for persistent fault elimination without modifying foundation model weights, offering a safer path for deploying autonomous agents in production environments.
ANNEAL: Adapting LLM Agents via Governed Symbolic Patch Learning
arXiv:2605.16309v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLM-based agents can recover from individual execution errors, yet they repeatedly fail on the same fault when the underlying process knowledge--operator schemas, preconditions, and constraints--remains unrepaired. Existing self-evolving approaches address this gap by updating prompts, memory, or model weights, but none directly repair the symbolic structures that encode how tasks are executed, and few provide the governance guarantees required for safe deployment. We introduce ANNEAL, a neuro-symbolic agent that converts recurring failures into governed symbolic edits of a process knowledge graph without modifying foundation model weights. Its core mechanism, Failure-Driven Knowledge Acquisition (FDKA), localizes the responsible operator, synthesizes a typed patch through constrained LLM generation, and validates the proposal via multi-dimensional scoring, symbolic guardrails, and canary testing before commit. Every accepted edit carries full provenance and deterministic rollback capability. Across four domains and 27 multi-seed runs, ANNEAL is the only evaluated system that commits persistent structural repairs--strong baselines such as ReAct and Reflexion achieve high episodic recovery yet retain 72--100% holdout failure rates on recurring faults, whereas ANNEAL reduces these to 0% in the tested recurring-failure settings. Ablation confirms that removing FDKA eliminates all structural repairs and drops success rate by up to 26.7 percentage points. These results suggest that governed symbolic repair offers a complementary paradigm to weight-level and prompt-level adaptation for persistent fault elimination.
Abstract:LLM-based agents can recover from individual execution errors, yet they repeatedly fail on the same fault when the underlying process knowledge--operator schemas, preconditions, and constraints--remains unrepaired. Existing self-evolving approaches address this gap by updating prompts, memory, or model weights, but none directly repair the symbolic structures that encode how tasks are executed, and few provide the governance guarantees required for safe deployment. We introduce ANNEAL, a neuro-symbolic agent that converts recurring failures into governed symbolic edits of a process knowledge graph without modifying foundation model weights. Its core mechanism, Failure-Driven Knowledge Acquisition (FDKA), localizes the responsible operator, synthesizes a typed patch through constrained LLM generation, and validates the proposal via multi-dimensional scoring, symbolic guardrails, and canary testing before commit. Every accepted edit carries full provenance and deterministic rollback capability. Across four domains and 27 multi-seed runs, ANNEAL is the only evaluated system that commits persistent structural repairs--strong baselines such as ReAct and Reflexion achieve high episodic recovery yet retain 72--100% holdout failure rates on recurring faults, whereas ANNEAL reduces these to 0% in the tested recurring-failure settings. Ablation confirms that removing FDKA eliminates all structural repairs and drops success rate by up to 26.7 percentage points. These results suggest that governed symbolic repair offers a complementary paradigm to weight-level and prompt-level adaptation for persistent fault elimination.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
arXiv:2605.16309 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2605.16309v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.16309 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 314 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026

Presentation: APIs for Agents: Rethinking API Programs in the MCP Era
InfoQ · 23 sept. 2026
VEPA: Verified Evolving Formal Policy for Lifelong LLM Agent Guardrails
arXiv · 12 oct. 2026

Gate AI Training, Not Just Releases
LessWrong · 28 sept. 2026