analiza aiqbench
This study leverages generative AI as a pedagogical tool, analyzing how student inquiry patterns shift during computer science problem-solving tasks using an automated classification system. By mapping 830 interactions against established taxonomies, the research reveals that while few question types dominate overall usage, their specific distribution evolves significantly throughout the learning process. These findings offer critical insights into optimizing AI-assisted education and understanding human-AI collaboration dynamics in technical domains.
Analysis of Types of Inquiries in Student-AI Interaction: A case study of two CS2 tasks
arXiv:2608.17919v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Background and Context: Question and inquiry are integral parts of knowledge seeking and learning. Despite their importance, students tend not to ask enough questions in the classroom. However, studies have shown that students interact extensively with generative AI systems for learning and problem solving. Objective: In this paper, we seek to better understand the types of questions that students ask AI systems, and how those questions evolve during problem solving and across tasks. Method: We use the Graesser et al. taxonomy to classify students' inquiries into 18 types. We develop a few-shot learning approach to automatically classify students' interactions with AI into these categories. We use this system to analyze 830 interactions of CS2 students across two programming tasks. Findings: Our results suggest that a small subset of question types accounts for the majority of student inquiries, and that the types of questions students ask change substantially as the task progresses.
Abstract:Background and Context: Question and inquiry are integral parts of knowledge seeking and learning. Despite their importance, students tend not to ask enough questions in the classroom. However, studies have shown that students interact extensively with generative AI systems for learning and problem solving. Objective: In this paper, we seek to better understand the types of questions that students ask AI systems, and how those questions evolve during problem solving and across tasks. Method: We use the Graesser et al. taxonomy to classify students' inquiries into 18 types. We develop a few-shot learning approach to automatically classify students' interactions with AI into these categories. We use this system to analyze 830 interactions of CS2 students across two programming tasks. Findings: Our results suggest that a small subset of question types accounts for the majority of student inquiries, and that the types of questions students ask change substantially as the task progresses.
Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.17919 [cs.HC]
(or arXiv:2608.17919v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.17919 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 248 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 3 oct. 2026

Reviewing failure modes in science as we prepare for AI researchers
LessWrong · 8 oct. 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · 5 oct. 2026