analiza aiqbench
This paper establishes a rigorous mathematical framework for consistent inductive inference, characterizing when a learner can limit prediction errors using order-theoretic principles rather than uniform mistake bounds. By linking consistent prediction to finite evidence and the Kleene-Brouwer ordering, it advances foundational theory in machine learning without relying on standard probabilistic assumptions.
An Order-Theoretic Characterization of Consistent Inductive Inference
arXiv:2609.28551v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When can a learner make only finitely many prediction errors along every infinite sequence labeled by a fixed, unknown hypothesis? We characterize this form of consistency for arbitrary binary hypothesis classes in ZFC, without requiring a uniform mistake bound. The characterization uses a single linear order on finite realizable traces. Each trace selects its least subtrace, and the order must satisfy two conditions: conflicting traces select different subtraces, and the order is well-founded on the traces of each fixed target. These conditions induce a learner whose selected evidence decreases on every mistake. Conversely, a consistent learner yields such an order through canonical mistake transcripts and the Kleene--Brouwer ordering. The result provides a representation of consistent prediction by finite evidence, answering a question of Lu (2024).
Abstract:When can a learner make only finitely many prediction errors along every infinite sequence labeled by a fixed, unknown hypothesis? We characterize this form of consistency for arbitrary binary hypothesis classes in ZFC, without requiring a uniform mistake bound. The characterization uses a single linear order on finite realizable traces. Each trace selects its least subtrace, and the order must satisfy two conditions: conflicting traces select different subtraces, and the order is well-founded on the traces of each fixed target. These conditions induce a learner whose selected evidence decreases on every mistake. Conversely, a consistent learner yields such an order through canonical mistake transcripts and the Kleene--Brouwer ordering. The result provides a representation of consistent prediction by finite evidence, answering a question of Lu (2024).
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.28551 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2609.28551v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.28551 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 222 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · 8 oct. 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · 23 sept. 2026

Deconfusing Corrigibility
AI Alignment Forum · 17 oct. 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · 30 iul. 2026