analiza aiqbench
This research introduces a novel, zero-parameter memory decision controller that addresses critical reliability issues in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) by explicitly decoupling confidence from consistency. By fusing relevance, reliability, and task risk signals, the proposed method significantly reduces hallucination rates when models encounter conflicting information in their memory stores. This advancement represents a meaningful step toward building more robust and trustworthy LLM agents capable of safe operation in high-risk scenarios.
An Interpretable Memory Decision Controller for LLM Agents Based on Three-Signal Complementarity: Decoupling Confidence and Consistency
arXiv:2609.22043v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Memory systems for large language models have focused predominantly on efficient retrieval, whereas the decision of whether retrieved memories should be trusted has received comparatively little attention. When the memory store contains conflicting positions, standard retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) blindly injects memories and amplifies hallucinations: in models susceptible to memory injection, the RAG hallucination rate under conflicting memories is markedly higher than that of a memory-free baseline. Inspired by memory signaling mechanisms in the prefrontal cortex, we propose the Memory Decision Layer (MDL), a zero-parameter memory decision controller situated between the retrieval and generation stages. Its core is a three-signal complementary encoder that fuses relevance, reliability, and task risk through QR-based orthogonal subspace projection and a meta-working-memory signal into an interpretable decision representation that quantifies the trustworthiness of retrieved memories. Building on this encoder, MDL explicitly decouples confidence from consistency and introduces risk inversion and explicit abstention. Evaluations on mainstream large language models and multiple open-source datasets show that MDL reduces the hallucination rate under conflicting memories by about 56.04% in general scenarios and approaches zero hallucination in high-risk scenarios. The controller is fully white-box: it relies purely on geometric operations, requires no trained parameters, and adds only about 0.14 ms per decision -- roughly 50x faster than the embedding-retrieval step that precedes it and four to five orders of magnitude faster than an LLM self-evaluation call.
Abstract:Memory systems for large language models have focused predominantly on efficient retrieval, whereas the decision of whether retrieved memories should be trusted has received comparatively little attention. When the memory store contains conflicting positions, standard retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) blindly injects memories and amplifies hallucinations: in models susceptible to memory injection, the RAG hallucination rate under conflicting memories is markedly higher than that of a memory-free baseline. Inspired by memory signaling mechanisms in the prefrontal cortex, we propose the Memory Decision Layer (MDL), a zero-parameter memory decision controller situated between the retrieval and generation stages. Its core is a three-signal complementary encoder that fuses relevance, reliability, and task risk through QR-based orthogonal subspace projection and a meta-working-memory signal into an interpretable decision representation that quantifies the trustworthiness of retrieved memories. Building on this encoder, MDL explicitly decouples confidence from consistency and introduces risk inversion and explicit abstention. Evaluations on mainstream large language models and multiple open-source datasets show that MDL reduces the hallucination rate under conflicting memories by about 56.04% in general scenarios and approaches zero hallucination in high-risk scenarios. The controller is fully white-box: it relies purely on geometric operations, requires no trained parameters, and adds only about 0.14 ms per decision -- roughly 50x faster than the embedding-retrieval step that precedes it and four to five orders of magnitude faster than an LLM self-evaluation call.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.22043 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.22043v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22043 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 321 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · 17 oct. 2026

[AINews] TypeSafe/Jev at >$100M ARR, $7.5B valuation 3 weeks after launch
Latent Space · 10 oct. 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · 27 aug. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026