analiza aiqbench
This empirical study benchmarks classical handcrafted descriptors like HOG against modern lightweight CNNs for facial expression recognition across three datasets. The findings confirm that while traditional methods retain utility in controlled settings, deep learning architectures are superior for handling complex real-world data variability. This research provides practical guidance on selecting appropriate feature extraction strategies based on dataset complexity and application constraints.
An Empirical Study of Handcrafted Feature Learning and Convolutional Neural Networks for Facial Expression Recognition
arXiv:2607.15288v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Facial expression recognition is an important computer vision task with applications in human--computer interaction, mental health monitoring, driver alert systems, and behavioral analysis. While convolutional neural networks (CNNs) dominate modern facial expression recognition, handcrafted feature descriptors such as Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) and Local Binary Patterns (LBP) remain useful classical baselines. This study compares HOG with Support Vector Machine (SVM), LBP with Logistic Regression, and a lightweight CNN across three facial expression datasets: FER-2013, CK+, and KDEF. The results show that CNNs achieve the best overall performance, particularly on more complex data, while HOG performs strongly in controlled environments. LBP performs poorly across all datasets. The study highlights that dataset complexity significantly affects performance and that robust feature learning is essential for real-world facial expression recognition.
Abstract:Facial expression recognition is an important computer vision task with applications in human--computer interaction, mental health monitoring, driver alert systems, and behavioral analysis. While convolutional neural networks (CNNs) dominate modern facial expression recognition, handcrafted feature descriptors such as Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) and Local Binary Patterns (LBP) remain useful classical baselines. This study compares HOG with Support Vector Machine (SVM), LBP with Logistic Regression, and a lightweight CNN across three facial expression datasets: FER-2013, CK+, and KDEF. The results show that CNNs achieve the best overall performance, particularly on more complex data, while HOG performs strongly in controlled environments. LBP performs poorly across all datasets. The study highlights that dataset complexity significantly affects performance and that robust feature learning is essential for real-world facial expression recognition.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2607.15288 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2607.15288v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.15288 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 225 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
State-specific respiratory signatures for affective and stress recognition: Interpretable respiratory markers, autocorrelation lags, and compact CNN models
arXiv · 14 sept. 2026
Lowering the Barrier to AI-Driven Inspection: A No-Code Workflow for Automated Structural Defect Detection
arXiv · 27 aug. 2026
Attention-Enhanced Deep Features with Heterogeneous Ensemble Learning for Glaucoma Detection
arXiv · 9 sept. 2026
Custom Named Entity Recognition and Topic Classification for Global Health Publications
arXiv · 22 sept. 2026