Sari la conținut

localeBeta.label localeBeta.notice localeBeta.readInEnglish

perspectiva aiqbenchProduse AI

analiza aiqbench

This study explores how augmented reality head-mounted displays can mitigate communication breakdowns in high-stakes action teams by fostering real-time "team alignment." While AR-HMDs are the hardware focus, the core contribution lies in the novel taxonomy for maintaining shared cognition and coordinating complex tasks under uncertainty. The research shifts the paradigm from individual task execution to collective situational awareness, offering a framework for integrating wearable tech into critical care workflows.
Surse care acoperăarXiv, terrytao.wordpress.com, SiliconANGLE, Latent Space
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Alignment Under Pressure: AR-HMD Support Tools for Action Teams

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2502.17295v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Team communication breakdowns represent a contributor to patient safety risks within action teams-defined as interdependent groups of specialized people who perform coordinated work under high workload, time pressure, and uncertainty. Approximately 70% of such instances lead to adverse patient outcomes amid intense time pressure, uncertainty, and high cognitive load. While prior research has focused on maintaining shared cognition during these interactions, existing technologies largely prioritize individual task execution and decision-making, offering limited support for real-time team coordination. This study investigates the potential of augmented reality head-mounted displays (AR-HMDs) to address this gap by facilitating what we call 'team alignment' - the active maintenance of shared understanding regarding tasks, patient state, responsibilities, and ongoing clinical activity. Through an 11-month multi-phase qualitative study with ten healthcare professionals, we first elicited coordination challenges through semi-structured interviews complemented by real-time storyboard creation. Participants then engaged in reflection and refinement of these scenarios while contemplating the potential impact of AR-HMDs on their situation. Our findings revealed that breakdowns frequently arose when clinicians lacked sufficient contextual information, when assigned responsibilities did not align with available expertise, or when procedural progress was difficult to track - particularly during critical bedside activity. We subsequently developed the Team Alignment and Coordination Taxonomy (TACT), encompassing information, expertise, procedural, and cognitive dimensions. By reframing coordination as this active maintenance of alignment, our research shifts the design focus from individual decision support systems to holistic, team-level system interventions.

Authors:Jonathan Isaac Segal (1), Jalynn Blu Nicoly (2), Huajie Cao (3), Soyon Kim (4), Tauhid Tanjim (1), Jonathan St. George (5), Kevin Ching (6), Francisco Raul Ortega (2), Hee Rin Lee (3), Angelique Taylor (7) ((1) Cornell University, (2) Colorado State University, (3) Michigan State University, (4) UC San Diego, (5) Weill Cornell, (6) Weill Cornell Medicine, (7) Cornell Tech)

Abstract:Team communication breakdowns represent a contributor to patient safety risks within action teams-defined as interdependent groups of specialized people who perform coordinated work under high workload, time pressure, and uncertainty. Approximately 70% of such instances lead to adverse patient outcomes amid intense time pressure, uncertainty, and high cognitive load. While prior research has focused on maintaining shared cognition during these interactions, existing technologies largely prioritize individual task execution and decision-making, offering limited support for real-time team coordination. This study investigates the potential of augmented reality head-mounted displays (AR-HMDs) to address this gap by facilitating what we call 'team alignment' - the active maintenance of shared understanding regarding tasks, patient state, responsibilities, and ongoing clinical activity. Through an 11-month multi-phase qualitative study with ten healthcare professionals, we first elicited coordination challenges through semi-structured interviews complemented by real-time storyboard creation. Participants then engaged in reflection and refinement of these scenarios while contemplating the potential impact of AR-HMDs on their situation. Our findings revealed that breakdowns frequently arose when clinicians lacked sufficient contextual information, when assigned responsibilities did not align with available expertise, or when procedural progress was difficult to track - particularly during critical bedside activity. We subsequently developed the Team Alignment and Coordination Taxonomy (TACT), encompassing information, expertise, procedural, and cognitive dimensions. By reframing coordination as this active maintenance of alignment, our research shifts the design focus from individual decision support systems to holistic, team-level system interventions.

20 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables. Submitted to CSCW 2027

Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2502.17295 [cs.HC]

(or arXiv:2502.17295v2 [cs.HC] for this version)

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 319 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe