Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This research proposes Greedy Information Projection (GIP), a novel data selection framework that unifies quality and diversity by preserving the query space inherent to downstream tasks. By framing selection as a residual minimization problem within embedding geometry, GIP enables high-performance fine-tuning using significantly smaller instruction subsets compared to full-data approaches. The method demonstrates broad applicability across supervised fine-tuning, pretraining, and retrieval-augmented generation contexts.
Surse care acoperăarXiv, LessWrong, AI Alignment Forum, Quantum Frontiers
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Aligning the Query Space: Greedy Information Projection for Language Model Data Selection

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2603.13790v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Data selection for language models is often framed as balancing example quality and diversity. We argue that both are consequences of a more fundamental principle: selected examples should preserve the downstream query space induced by instructions, task signals, or retrieval needs. We present Greedy Information Projection (GIP), a query-aligned method that requires only candidate embeddings and a score signal from LLM judgments, metadata, or intrinsic geometry. GIP greedily selects examples whose embedding span explains the largest residual component of task/query scores, yielding a fast matching-pursuit selector. A Gaussian projection view connects this update to maximizing mutual information, equivalently minimizing the residual volume of the query subspace left unexplained by selected data; this explains how quality and diversity emerge from one objective. Empirically, GIP matches or surpasses full-data fine-tuning using small instruction and reasoning subsets, while pretraining and RAG passage-selection experiments show that the same residual principle transfers beyond supervised fine-tuning.

Abstract:Data selection for language models is often framed as balancing example quality and diversity. We argue that both are consequences of a more fundamental principle: selected examples should preserve the downstream query space induced by instructions, task signals, or retrieval needs. We present Greedy Information Projection (GIP), a query-aligned method that requires only candidate embeddings and a score signal from LLM judgments, metadata, or intrinsic geometry. GIP greedily selects examples whose embedding span explains the largest residual component of task/query scores, yielding a fast matching-pursuit selector. A Gaussian projection view connects this update to maximizing mutual information, equivalently minimizing the residual volume of the query subspace left unexplained by selected data; this explains how quality and diversity emerge from one objective. Empirically, GIP matches or surpasses full-data fine-tuning using small instruction and reasoning subsets, while pretraining and RAG passage-selection experiments show that the same residual principle transfers beyond supervised fine-tuning.

Accepted to EMNLP 2026. An earlier version was accepted to 3rd DATA-FM workshop at ICLR 2026

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2603.13790 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2603.13790v2 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.13790 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 262 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe