AI-Assisted Tumor-Growth Law Discovery from Sparse Data: Refitting and LLM-Based Ranking

Abstract:Inferring tumor-growth laws from sparse, noisy observations requires more than accurate curve fitting. We study an AI-assisted workflow involving symbolic regression, mathematical admissibility checks, coefficient refitting, and large language model (LLM) ranking. Synthetic Gompertz data allow trajectory fit, forecasting, and recovery of the governing growth law to be assessed separately. A dense noiseless control recovers the generating family, but sparse noisy sampling frequently leads to alternative forms. Among retained candidates in the tested configurations, physics-informed neural network refitting often increases growth-law error, whereas classical nonlinear least squares usually reduces it. A separate exploratory analysis of archived LLM rankings shows no consistent improvement over selection by training error and identifies errors in mathematical reasoning. Plausible saturation, accurate trajectory fits, and convincing explanations can therefore coexist with incorrect growth laws. Mathematical validity and law recovery require evaluation alongside predictive performance.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.16891 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.16891v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.16891 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.