analiza aiqbench
This paper introduces "Agentomics," a framework that shifts AI evaluation from isolated technical metrics to economic valuation within human-AI workflows. By modeling agent deployment as a coalition-formation problem, it applies the Shapley value to attribute surplus and establish market pricing benchmarks for agentic systems. This approach provides a rigorous method for assessing productivity gains and reliability losses in hybrid organizational environments where AI acts as a productive resource rather than just an isolated tool.
Agentomics: Economic Foundations for the Valuation, Attribution, and Pricing of AI Agents in Human-AI Workflows
arXiv:2606.14769v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic AI systems are increasingly being deployed as productive resources in organizational workflows, yet existing evaluation methods primarily measure isolated technical performance rather than economic contribution. This paper introduces \emph{Agentomics}, a workflow-based framework for valuing, attributing, and pricing human and artificial agents. The framework models a workflow as a configuration of heterogeneous agents whose collective performance determines gross value, deployment cost, reliability, and expected failure loss. Workflow value is treated as a team-level quantity that may include complementarities, substitution effects, bottlenecks, and nonlinear production; additive stage-level value is only a special case. Building on this workflow model, the paper formulates AI deployment as a coalition-formation problem and defines coalition value as the incremental net surplus generated relative to a benchmark human workflow. The Shapley value is then used to attribute economic surplus among participating AI agents, yielding a principled connection among valuation, accountability, and market pricing. The resulting Shapley pricing equilibrium provides a normative benchmark for assessing whether agent prices reflect expected marginal contribution. A security-operations case study illustrates how the framework accounts for productivity gains, deployment costs, reliability losses, and coalition-level complementarities in hybrid human--AI workflows.
Abstract:Agentic AI systems are increasingly being deployed as productive resources in organizational workflows, yet existing evaluation methods primarily measure isolated technical performance rather than economic contribution. This paper introduces \emph{Agentomics}, a workflow-based framework for valuing, attributing, and pricing human and artificial agents. The framework models a workflow as a configuration of heterogeneous agents whose collective performance determines gross value, deployment cost, reliability, and expected failure loss. Workflow value is treated as a team-level quantity that may include complementarities, substitution effects, bottlenecks, and nonlinear production; additive stage-level value is only a special case. Building on this workflow model, the paper formulates AI deployment as a coalition-formation problem and defines coalition value as the incremental net surplus generated relative to a benchmark human workflow. The Shapley value is then used to attribute economic surplus among participating AI agents, yielding a principled connection among valuation, accountability, and market pricing. The resulting Shapley pricing equilibrium provides a normative benchmark for assessing whether agent prices reflect expected marginal contribution. A security-operations case study illustrates how the framework accounts for productivity gains, deployment costs, reliability losses, and coalition-level complementarities in hybrid human--AI workflows.
Econometrics (econ.EM); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
I.2.11; J.1; K.6.5
arXiv:2606.14769 [econ.EM]
(or arXiv:2606.14769v1 [econ.EM] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.14769 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 290 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Which Modality Decides? Counterfactual Modality Attribution for Multimodal LLMs
arXiv · 4 aug. 2026
ParA-LLM: A Unified Approach to Paralinguistic and Acoustic Speech Understanding
arXiv · 22 sept. 2026
Towards One-for-All Foundation Model for Attributed Graph Clustering
arXiv · 7 oct. 2026

Managing Amazon Bedrock costs end to end: A playbook for FinOps and platform teams
AWS · 30 oct. 2026