analiza aiqbench
This research identifies online sensor calibration as a critical, previously overlooked attack surface for autonomous vehicles, demonstrating that physical adversarial posters can permanently corrupt camera-LiDAR fusion. By spoofing miscalibration detectors and steering estimators toward incorrect transformations, the proposed method induces severe perception errors that propagate to planning and control systems. These findings highlight an urgent need to harden runtime calibration algorithms against external manipulation to ensure vehicle safety in dynamic environments.
Adversarial Calibration Attack on Autonomous Vehicles
arXiv:2608.28778v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous vehicles (AVs) rely on accurate camera-LiDAR calibration for multimodal sensor fusion. In practice, calibration can drift due to vibration, temperature variation, or minor sensor displacement, motivating online calibration algorithms that detect and correct misalignment at runtime while allowing the vehicle to continue operating without a factory visit. Existing AV attacks largely assume correct calibration. We instead identify online sensor calibration as a new attack plane. A corrupted calibration update can persist across subsequent fusion operations, causing system-wide errors that propagate from perception to planning and control. We present Adversarial Calibration Attack (ACA), the first physical attack against camera-LiDAR online calibration. Using a single adversarial poster, ACA first spoofs the miscalibration detector to trigger the calibration process and then steers the calibration estimator toward an incorrect transformation. A unified optimization jointly designs the poster's geometry and texture for both objectives. We evaluate ACA across benchmark datasets, simulation, and physical experiments. On benchmark datasets such as KITTI and nuScenes, ACA induces up to 33.9 degrees mean rotational calibration error, thereby severely degrading object detection. In the CARLA simulator, the attack causes a collision when the corrupted calibration is accepted in vulnerable scenarios crafted by the attacker. On a real Husky robot, a printed adversarial poster successfully reproduces the calibration error. These results demonstrate that online calibration is a practical and safety-critical attack surface for AVs.
Abstract:Autonomous vehicles (AVs) rely on accurate camera-LiDAR calibration for multimodal sensor fusion. In practice, calibration can drift due to vibration, temperature variation, or minor sensor displacement, motivating online calibration algorithms that detect and correct misalignment at runtime while allowing the vehicle to continue operating without a factory visit. Existing AV attacks largely assume correct calibration. We instead identify online sensor calibration as a new attack plane. A corrupted calibration update can persist across subsequent fusion operations, causing system-wide errors that propagate from perception to planning and control. We present Adversarial Calibration Attack (ACA), the first physical attack against camera-LiDAR online calibration. Using a single adversarial poster, ACA first spoofs the miscalibration detector to trigger the calibration process and then steers the calibration estimator toward an incorrect transformation. A unified optimization jointly designs the poster's geometry and texture for both objectives. We evaluate ACA across benchmark datasets, simulation, and physical experiments. On benchmark datasets such as KITTI and nuScenes, ACA induces up to 33.9 degrees mean rotational calibration error, thereby severely degrading object detection. In the CARLA simulator, the attack causes a collision when the corrupted calibration is accepted in vulnerable scenarios crafted by the attacker. On a real Husky robot, a printed adversarial poster successfully reproduces the calibration error. These results demonstrate that online calibration is a practical and safety-critical attack surface for AVs.
Robotics (cs.RO); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
arXiv:2608.28778 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2608.28778v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.28778 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 257 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Drone WMDs Don’t Need Any New Technology
LessWrong · 20 iul. 2026

DEF CON 34 Opens Today: AI Agents Graduate From Novelty to Standard Hacking Weapon
techtimes.com · 6 aug. 2026
Adversarial Trust Poisoning in Vehicular Collaborative Perception
arXiv · 1 sept. 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026