Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This paper establishes a theoretical breakthrough in off-policy evaluation by proving that additive control variates asymptotically outperform the standard self-normalised inverse propensity scoring method. The findings provide rigorous justification for replacing multiplicative baselines with optimal additive corrections to reduce variance in ranking and recommendation systems without costly online interventions. This shift represents a significant refinement in estimator efficiency within reinforcement learning and information retrieval applications.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Additive Control Variates Dominate Self-Normalisation in Off-Policy Evaluation

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2602.14914v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Off-policy evaluation (OPE) is essential for assessing ranking and recommendation systems without costly online interventions. Self-Normalised Inverse Propensity Scoring (SNIPS) is a standard tool for variance reduction in OPE, leveraging a multiplicative control variate. Recent advances in off-policy learning suggest that additive control variates (baseline corrections) may offer superior performance, yet theoretical guarantees for evaluation are lacking. This paper provides a definitive answer: we prove that $\beta^\star$-IPS, an estimator with an optimal additive baseline, asymptotically dominates SNIPS in Mean Squared Error. By analytically decomposing the variance gap, we show that SNIPS is asymptotically equivalent to using a specific -- but generally sub-optimal -- additive baseline. Our results theoretically justify shifting from self-normalisation to optimal baseline corrections for both ranking and recommendation.

Abstract:Off-policy evaluation (OPE) is essential for assessing ranking and recommendation systems without costly online interventions. Self-Normalised Inverse Propensity Scoring (SNIPS) is a standard tool for variance reduction in OPE, leveraging a multiplicative control variate. Recent advances in off-policy learning suggest that additive control variates (baseline corrections) may offer superior performance, yet theoretical guarantees for evaluation are lacking. This paper provides a definitive answer: we prove that $\beta^\star$-IPS, an estimator with an optimal additive baseline, asymptotically dominates SNIPS in Mean Squared Error. By analytically decomposing the variance gap, we show that SNIPS is asymptotically equivalent to using a specific -- but generally sub-optimal -- additive baseline. Our results theoretically justify shifting from self-normalisation to optimal baseline corrections for both ranking and recommendation.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)

arXiv:2602.14914 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2602.14914v3 [cs.LG] for this version)

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 135 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe