analiza aiqbench
This paper advances active learning theory by demonstrating that $O(d)$ labels are sufficient for constant-factor approximation in linear regression, improving upon previous leverage score sampling bounds of $O(d \log d)$. The methodology extends to polynomial regression and continuous sparse Fourier transforms, offering more efficient sample complexity for curve fitting tasks.
Active Regression via Linear-Sample Sparsification
arXiv:1711.10051v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We present an approach that improves the sample complexity for a variety of curve fitting problems, including active learning for linear regression, polynomial regression, and continuous sparse Fourier transforms. In the active linear regression problem, one would like to estimate the least squares solution $\beta^*$ minimizing $\|X\beta - y\|_2$ given the entire unlabeled dataset $X \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$ but only observing a small number of labels $y_i$. We show that $O(d)$ labels suffice to find a constant factor approximation $\tilde{\beta}$: \[ \mathbb{E}[\|X\tilde{\beta} - y\|_2^2] \leq 2 \mathbb{E}[\|X \beta^* - y\|_2^2]. \] This improves on the best previous result of $O(d \log d)$ from leverage score sampling. We also present results for the \emph{inductive} setting, showing when $\tilde{\beta}$ will generalize to fresh samples; these apply to continuous settings such as polynomial regression. Finally, we show how the techniques yield improved results for the non-linear sparse Fourier transform setting.
Abstract:We present an approach that improves the sample complexity for a variety of curve fitting problems, including active learning for linear regression, polynomial regression, and continuous sparse Fourier transforms. In the active linear regression problem, one would like to estimate the least squares solution $\beta^*$ minimizing $\|X\beta - y\|_2$ given the entire unlabeled dataset $X \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$ but only observing a small number of labels $y_i$. We show that $O(d)$ labels suffice to find a constant factor approximation $\tilde{\beta}$: \[ \mathbb{E}[\|X\tilde{\beta} - y\|_2^2] \leq 2 \mathbb{E}[\|X \beta^* - y\|_2^2]. \] This improves on the best previous result of $O(d \log d)$ from leverage score sampling. We also present results for the \emph{inductive} setting, showing when $\tilde{\beta}$ will generalize to fresh samples; these apply to continuous settings such as polynomial regression. Finally, we show how the techniques yield improved results for the non-linear sparse Fourier transform setting.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)
arXiv:1711.10051 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:1711.10051v4 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1711.10051 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 245 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Spurious probes as a black-box alternative to activation probing
LessWrong · 25 sept. 2026

GEM Training: How Meta Doubled the Efficiency of Its LLM-Scale Ads Foundation Model
Meta Engineering · 3 aug. 2026

Generalization and infinite width
LessWrong · 1 aug. 2026
Who can sample forever? Shot noise effects in quantum linear regression
arXiv · 9 oct. 2026