analiza aiqbench
This research reframes Active Inference as a convex Markov decision process by decomposing expected free energy minimization into linear pragmatic rewards and nonlinear epistemic components. By deriving a mirror descent algorithm compatible with actor-critic methods, the work provides convergence guarantees that bridge variational inference principles with modern reinforcement learning optimization theory. This structural grounding offers principled policy improvement paths for agents balancing exploration (epistemic) and exploitation (pragmatic) objectives within closed-loop control systems.
Active Inference as a Convex Markov Decision Process
arXiv:2607.20152v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Active Inference (AIF) frames adaptive behavior as the minimization of expected free energy (EFE), combining epistemic and pragmatic objectives within a single variational principle. We frame AIF as policy optimization and show that, for closed-loop control policies, EFE minimization can be formulated as a convex Markov decision process (MDP). In this formulation, the pragmatic terms are linear in the predictive state marginals and therefore equivalent to reward maximization in a latent MDP, while the epistemic value introduces a nonlinear component that distinguishes EFE minimization from standard reinforcement learning. This perspective further reveals the epistemic drive of active inference as a policy-dependent (performative) reward. We analyze finite-horizon, discounted, and average-reward formulations of EFE and derive a mirror descent (MD) algorithm that locally linearizes the objective around the current state marginals, yielding a policy-dependent reward that is compatible with actor-critic methods and dynamic programming. Finally, we argue that coupling world-model learning with policy optimization gives active inference the structure of performative reinforcement learning, providing a route toward grounding active inference within modern reinforcement learning and optimization theory, including convergence analysis and principled policy improvement guarantees.
Abstract:Active Inference (AIF) frames adaptive behavior as the minimization of expected free energy (EFE), combining epistemic and pragmatic objectives within a single variational principle. We frame AIF as policy optimization and show that, for closed-loop control policies, EFE minimization can be formulated as a convex Markov decision process (MDP). In this formulation, the pragmatic terms are linear in the predictive state marginals and therefore equivalent to reward maximization in a latent MDP, while the epistemic value introduces a nonlinear component that distinguishes EFE minimization from standard reinforcement learning. This perspective further reveals the epistemic drive of active inference as a policy-dependent (performative) reward. We analyze finite-horizon, discounted, and average-reward formulations of EFE and derive a mirror descent (MD) algorithm that locally linearizes the objective around the current state marginals, yielding a policy-dependent reward that is compatible with actor-critic methods and dynamic programming. Finally, we argue that coupling world-model learning with policy optimization gives active inference the structure of performative reinforcement learning, providing a route toward grounding active inference within modern reinforcement learning and optimization theory, including convergence analysis and principled policy improvement guarantees.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2607.20152 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2607.20152v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.20152 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 283 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 18 sept. 2026
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · 8 oct. 2026
Intention Inference Under Execution Noise: Separating Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Social Dilemmas
arXiv · 4 aug. 2026
Reformulate LLM Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Training under Black-box Discrepancy
arXiv · 10 iun. 2026