Acoustic and perceptual differences between standard and accented speech and their voice clones

Abstract:Voice cloning is often evaluated in terms of overall quality, but less is known about accent preservation and its perceptual consequences. We compare standard and heavily accented Mandarin speech and their voice clones using a combined computational and perceptual design. Embedding-based analyses showed larger original-clone distances for accented speakers in several speaker-discriminative embedding spaces, but this difference disappeared after adjusting for each speaker's within-original baseline variability. In the perception study, clones are rated as more similar to their originals for standard than for accented speakers, and intelligibility increases from original to clone, with a larger gain for accented speech. These results show that accent variation can shape perceived identity match and intelligibility in voice cloning even when it is not observed in baseline-adjusted speaker-embedding distance, and they motivate treating accent preservation as an explicit component of speaker identity preservation, rather than assuming that it is fully captured by off-the-shelf speaker-discriminative embeddings.

Sound (cs.SD); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)

arXiv:2604.01562 [cs.SD]

(or arXiv:2604.01562v3 [cs.SD] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.01562 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.