analiza aiqbench
This research resolves the ambiguity of attention sinks by distinguishing between two distinct mechanisms: adaptive nop (suppressing updates) and broadcast (aggregating global information). The study provides practical diagnostics to identify these patterns in pretrained vision transformers and demonstrates that combining gating with register tokens yields superior stability and performance compared to single-intervention approaches. For practitioners, the key takeaway is that effective model intervention requires diagnosing the specific computational role of a sink rather than applying generic fixes.
A Unifying View of Attention Sinks: Two Algorithms, Two Solutions
arXiv:2606.08105v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When attention concentrates on a single token, a sink, what is the model actually computing? Attention sinks are ubiquitous in softmax transformers, yet this shared visual signature can hide fundamentally different algorithms. We show that visually similar sink patterns can reflect two distinct mechanisms: {i} adaptive nop, where a head suppresses its update by routing to a null token, and {ii} broadcast, where a sink aggregates and redistributes global information. In that case, sinks serve an analogous role: a safe destination when there is nothing useful to compute. Proposed interventions like gating or registers work because they implicitly target one or the other, revealing a duality between method and assumed mechanism: gating implicitly assumes nop; registers implicitly assume broadcast. Each mechanism leaves distinct traces (nop sinks exhibit negligible value norms; broadcast sinks induce low-rank outputs) which we formalize on synthetic tasks and use to derive practical diagnostics. Applied to pretrained vision transformers, these diagnostics reveal that both mechanisms exist at scale: sinks transition from CLS in early layers to patches in deeper layers, and concentrate in specialized heads. Strikingly, register tokens, designed for broadcast, are repurposed to also serve nop, confirming that neither intervention alone suffices. Combining gating with registers yields complementary gains in stability and performance. Overall, we find that the same attention pattern can reflect two very different computations and effective intervention requires first asking what the model is actually computing.
Abstract:When attention concentrates on a single token, a sink, what is the model actually computing? Attention sinks are ubiquitous in softmax transformers, yet this shared visual signature can hide fundamentally different algorithms. We show that visually similar sink patterns can reflect two distinct mechanisms: {i} adaptive nop, where a head suppresses its update by routing to a null token, and {ii} broadcast, where a sink aggregates and redistributes global information. In that case, sinks serve an analogous role: a safe destination when there is nothing useful to compute. Proposed interventions like gating or registers work because they implicitly target one or the other, revealing a duality between method and assumed mechanism: gating implicitly assumes nop; registers implicitly assume broadcast. Each mechanism leaves distinct traces (nop sinks exhibit negligible value norms; broadcast sinks induce low-rank outputs) which we formalize on synthetic tasks and use to derive practical diagnostics. Applied to pretrained vision transformers, these diagnostics reveal that both mechanisms exist at scale: sinks transition from CLS in early layers to patches in deeper layers, and concentrate in specialized heads. Strikingly, register tokens, designed for broadcast, are repurposed to also serve nop, confirming that neither intervention alone suffices. Combining gating with registers yields complementary gains in stability and performance. Overall, we find that the same attention pattern can reflect two very different computations and effective intervention requires first asking what the model is actually computing.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.08105 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.08105v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.08105 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 327 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Humanity’s Last Invention — Richard Socher of Recursive
Latent Space · 14 sept. 2026

Agentic vision: Building visual intelligence with Amazon Bedrock and MCP servers
AWS · 15 iul. 2026
A Unifying View of Attention Sinks: From Mechanisms to Architectural Interventions
arXiv · 6 oct. 2026

Build a Physical AI model factory with NVIDIA Cosmos 3 on SageMaker HyperPod
AWS · 4 sept. 2026