analiza aiqbench
This research presents a novel tri-agent framework designed to benchmark Large Language Models on their ability to handle ambiguous queries and clarify user intent through dialogue. By utilizing synthetic data generation within specific domains like supply chains, the study establishes new metrics for evaluating ambiguity resolution, question quality, and final intent alignment. The work advances the field by providing a structured methodology to validate conversational capabilities against both automated judges and human judgments.
A Tri-Agent Framework for Evaluating and Aligning Question Clarification Capabilities of Large Language Models
arXiv:2609.02054v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in interactive systems where understanding user intent precisely is paramount. A key capability for such systems is effective question clarification, especially when user queries are ambiguous or underspecified. This paper introduces a novel tri-agent framework for the robust evaluation of an LLM's ability to engage in clarifying dialogue. Our framework comprises three distinct LLM-based agents: (1) a Question Clarifying Agent (QCA), the system under evaluation, tasked with identifying ambiguities and posing clarifying questions; (2) a Respondent Agent (RA), designed to simulate human user responses, potentially including irrelevant or challenging replies; and (3) an Evaluator Agent (EA), an LLM-as-a-judge, which assesses the quality of the dialogue based on a comprehensive set of metrics. We detail a methodology for synthetic data generation in the supply chain domain as an example. We propose metrics evaluating ambiguity handling, question quality, dialogue efficiency, language appropriateness, and final intent alignment. We also briefly discuss the validation of the EA against human judgments. This work provides a structured approach to benchmark, validate, and improve the clarification capabilities of conversational LLM applications.
Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in interactive systems where understanding user intent precisely is paramount. A key capability for such systems is effective question clarification, especially when user queries are ambiguous or underspecified. This paper introduces a novel tri-agent framework for the robust evaluation of an LLM's ability to engage in clarifying dialogue. Our framework comprises three distinct LLM-based agents: (1) a Question Clarifying Agent (QCA), the system under evaluation, tasked with identifying ambiguities and posing clarifying questions; (2) a Respondent Agent (RA), designed to simulate human user responses, potentially including irrelevant or challenging replies; and (3) an Evaluator Agent (EA), an LLM-as-a-judge, which assesses the quality of the dialogue based on a comprehensive set of metrics. We detail a methodology for synthetic data generation in the supply chain domain as an example. We propose metrics evaluating ambiguity handling, question quality, dialogue efficiency, language appropriateness, and final intent alignment. We also briefly discuss the validation of the EA against human judgments. This work provides a structured approach to benchmark, validate, and improve the clarification capabilities of conversational LLM applications.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.02054 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.02054v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.02054 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 276 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 3 oct. 2026

Underwriting Superintelligence: Backing Agents you can Sue — Rune Kvist, AIUC
Latent Space · 16 sept. 2026

[AINews] Claude Fable/Mythos 5.1: new SOTA model, 75% cache price cut but 70% more output tokens
Latent Space · 2 sept. 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026