analiza aiqbench
This research introduces a thermometric quantum Brownian motion model to address limitations in standard quantum optical master equations when modeling dissipative electronics at low temperatures. By comparing predictions against the QOME framework, the study highlights distinct physical behaviors relevant to superconducting phenomena and proposes experimental tests to validate these models. This work advances the theoretical foundation for quantum circuit design and noise characterization in cryogenic environments.
A thermometric quantum Brownian model for low-temperature electronics
arXiv:2608.26646v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantum mechanical models of resistors in quantum electronics are often based on the quantum optical master equation (QOME). The QOME overlooks several fundamental properties, limiting its ability to model certain superconducting phenomena. Here we present a thermometric model of resistors, adapted from the quantum Brownian motion equation (QBME), that facilitates practical use of the QBME in modelling dissipative electronics at low temperatures. We compare the thermometric QBME presented here with predictions of the QOME, in the simple example of a transmon shunted by a resistor. We show that both the QBME and QOME yield comparable but physically distinct predictions, and discuss potential experimental tests with which to discriminate their use in modelling practical experiments.
Abstract:Quantum mechanical models of resistors in quantum electronics are often based on the quantum optical master equation (QOME). The QOME overlooks several fundamental properties, limiting its ability to model certain superconducting phenomena. Here we present a thermometric model of resistors, adapted from the quantum Brownian motion equation (QBME), that facilitates practical use of the QBME in modelling dissipative electronics at low temperatures. We compare the thermometric QBME presented here with predictions of the QOME, in the simple example of a transmon shunted by a resistor. We show that both the QBME and QOME yield comparable but physically distinct predictions, and discuss potential experimental tests with which to discriminate their use in modelling practical experiments.
arXiv:2608.26646 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2608.26646v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26646 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 205 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Reducing Spatial and Temporal Dimensionality in the Multidimensional Caldeira-Leggett Model
Quantum Journal · 2 sept. 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026

Quantum Computers Model Materials’ Electrons with Fewer Measurements
Quantum Zeitgeist · 30 mai 2026

Quantum simulator finds a ‘pseudogap’ in a model material
Quantum Zeitgeist · 11 sept. 2026